| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2010 11:54:12 -0400
From: Dan Rosenberg <dan.j.rosenberg@...il.com>
To: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@...com>
Cc: sri@...ibm.com, linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sctp: prevent reading out-of-bounds memory
Hopefully this covers everything.
Signed-off-by: Dan Rosenberg <dan.j.rosenberg@...il.com>
--- linux-2.6.35.4.orig/net/sctp/socket.c 2010-09-03 08:58:48.127080114 -0400
+++ linux-2.6.35.4/net/sctp/socket.c 2010-09-03 11:52:28.239595395 -0400
@@ -916,6 +916,12 @@ SCTP_STATIC int sctp_setsockopt_bindx(st
/* Walk through the addrs buffer and count the number of addresses. */
addr_buf = kaddrs;
while (walk_size < addrs_size) {
+
+ if (walk_size + sizeof(sa_family_t) > addrs_size) {
+ kfree(kaddrs);
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
sa_addr = (struct sockaddr *)addr_buf;
af = sctp_get_af_specific(sa_addr->sa_family);
@@ -1002,9 +1008,14 @@ static int __sctp_connect(struct sock* s
/* Walk through the addrs buffer and count the number of addresses. */
addr_buf = kaddrs;
while (walk_size < addrs_size) {
+
+ if (walk_size + sizeof(sa_family_t) > addrs_size) {
+ err = -EINVAL;
+ goto out_free;
+ }
+
sa_addr = (union sctp_addr *)addr_buf;
af = sctp_get_af_specific(sa_addr->sa.sa_family);
- port = ntohs(sa_addr->v4.sin_port);
/* If the address family is not supported or if this address
* causes the address buffer to overflow return EINVAL.
@@ -1013,6 +1024,8 @@ static int __sctp_connect(struct sock* s
err = -EINVAL;
goto out_free;
}
+
+ port = ntohs(sa_addr->v4.sin_port);
/* Save current address so we can work with it */
memcpy(&to, sa_addr, af->sockaddr_len);
On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 11:49 AM, Vlad Yasevich
<vladislav.yasevich@...com> wrote:
> On 09/03/2010 10:47 AM, Dan Rosenberg wrote:
>> Ugh, just remembered the port number is also dereferenced, so the
>> second of these two checks needs to be expanded to the size of a
>> sockaddr_in. Note to self: don't write patches on too little sleep.
>> Apologies for the unnecessary traffic.
>>
>
> Actually, you can move that down. Otherwise, we'd end up executing the same code
> twice which is just silly.
>
> So, the code should be like this:
> 1. see if we can get the address family.
> 2. Get the address family.
> 3. see if we get the sockaddr of appropriate size,
> 4. Get that structure.
> 5. reference fields.
>
> -vlad
>
>> Signed-off-by: Dan Rosenberg <dan.j.rosenberg@...il.com>
>>
>> --- linux-2.6.35.4.orig/net/sctp/socket.c 2010-09-03 08:58:48.127080114 -0400
>> +++ linux-2.6.35.4/net/sctp/socket.c 2010-09-03 10:45:08.467098052 -0400
>> @@ -916,6 +916,12 @@ SCTP_STATIC int sctp_setsockopt_bindx(st
>> /* Walk through the addrs buffer and count the number of addresses. */
>> addr_buf = kaddrs;
>> while (walk_size < addrs_size) {
>> +
>> + if (walk_size + sizeof(sa_family_t) > addrs_size) {
>> + kfree(kaddrs);
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + }
>> +
>> sa_addr = (struct sockaddr *)addr_buf;
>> af = sctp_get_af_specific(sa_addr->sa_family);
>>
>> @@ -1002,6 +1008,12 @@ static int __sctp_connect(struct sock* s
>> /* Walk through the addrs buffer and count the number of addresses. */
>> addr_buf = kaddrs;
>> while (walk_size < addrs_size) {
>> +
>> + if (walk_size + sizeof(struct sockaddr_in) > addrs_size) {
>> + err = -EINVAL;
>> + goto out_free;
>> + }
>> +
>> sa_addr = (union sctp_addr *)addr_buf;
>> af = sctp_get_af_specific(sa_addr->sa.sa_family);
>> port = ntohs(sa_addr->v4.sin_port);
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 10:35 AM, Dan Rosenberg
>> <dan.j.rosenberg@...il.com> wrote:
>>> Ha, I knew there was an easier way. Take two:
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Dan Rosenberg <dan.j.rosenberg@...il.com>
>>>
>>> --- linux-2.6.35.4.orig/net/sctp/socket.c 2010-09-03 08:58:48.127080114 -0400
>>> +++ linux-2.6.35.4/net/sctp/socket.c 2010-09-03 10:28:14.929595312 -0400
>>> @@ -916,6 +916,12 @@ SCTP_STATIC int sctp_setsockopt_bindx(st
>>> /* Walk through the addrs buffer and count the number of addresses. */
>>> addr_buf = kaddrs;
>>> while (walk_size < addrs_size) {
>>> +
>>> + if (walk_size + sizeof(sa_family_t) > addrs_size) {
>>> + kfree(kaddrs);
>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> sa_addr = (struct sockaddr *)addr_buf;
>>> af = sctp_get_af_specific(sa_addr->sa_family);
>>>
>>> @@ -1002,6 +1008,12 @@ static int __sctp_connect(struct sock* s
>>> /* Walk through the addrs buffer and count the number of addresses. */
>>> addr_buf = kaddrs;
>>> while (walk_size < addrs_size) {
>>> +
>>> + if (walk_size + sizeof(sa_family_t) > addrs_size) {
>>> + err = -EINVAL;
>>> + goto out_free;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> sa_addr = (union sctp_addr *)addr_buf;
>>> af = sctp_get_af_specific(sa_addr->sa.sa_family);
>>> port = ntohs(sa_addr->v4.sin_port);
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hm.. we already validate that we have the proper amount of space for a given sockaddr.
>>>> The only thing we are missing is making sure that there is room to get the proper address
>>>> family and I think you can do that without adding any extra variables:
>>>>
>>>> if (walk_size + sizeof(sa_family_t) > addr_size) {
>>>> /* Not enough room for address family */
>>>> kfree(kaddrs);
>>>> return -EINVAL;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> -vlad
>>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 10:15 AM, Vlad Yasevich
>>> <vladislav.yasevich@...com> wrote:
>>>> On 09/03/2010 09:48 AM, Dan Rosenberg wrote:
>>>>> Two user-controlled allocations in SCTP are subsequently dereferenced
>>>>> as sockaddr structs, without checking if the dereferenced struct
>>>>> members fall beyond the end of the allocated chunk. There doesn't
>>>>> appear to be any information leakage here based on how these members
>>>>> are used and additional checking, but it's still worth fixing.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Dan Rosenberg <dan.j.rosenberg@...il.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> --- linux-2.6.35.4.orig/net/sctp/socket.c 2010-09-03 08:58:48.127080114 -0400
>>>>> +++ linux-2.6.35.4/net/sctp/socket.c 2010-09-03 09:22:06.337096825 -0400
>>>>> @@ -889,6 +889,7 @@ SCTP_STATIC int sctp_setsockopt_bindx(st
>>>>> int err;
>>>>> int addrcnt = 0;
>>>>> int walk_size = 0;
>>>>> + unsigned int remaining = addrs_size;
>>>>> struct sockaddr *sa_addr;
>>>>> void *addr_buf;
>>>>> struct sctp_af *af;
>>>>> @@ -916,6 +917,13 @@ SCTP_STATIC int sctp_setsockopt_bindx(st
>>>>> /* Walk through the addrs buffer and count the number of addresses. */
>>>>> addr_buf = kaddrs;
>>>>> while (walk_size < addrs_size) {
>>>>> +
>>>>> + /* Don't read out-of-bounds memory */
>>>>> + if (remaining < sizeof(struct sockaddr)) {
>>>>> + kfree(kaddrs);
>>>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>>>> + }
>>>>> +
>>>>> sa_addr = (struct sockaddr *)addr_buf;
>>>>> af = sctp_get_af_specific(sa_addr->sa_family);
>>>>>
>>>>> @@ -929,6 +937,7 @@ SCTP_STATIC int sctp_setsockopt_bindx(st
>>>>> addrcnt++;
>>>>> addr_buf += af->sockaddr_len;
>>>>> walk_size += af->sockaddr_len;
>>>>> + remaining -= af->sockaddr_len;
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>> /* Do the work. */
>>>>> @@ -984,6 +993,7 @@ static int __sctp_connect(struct sock* s
>>>>> void *addr_buf;
>>>>> unsigned short port;
>>>>> unsigned int f_flags = 0;
>>>>> + unsigned int remaining = addrs_size;
>>>>>
>>>>> sp = sctp_sk(sk);
>>>>> ep = sp->ep;
>>>>> @@ -1002,6 +1012,13 @@ static int __sctp_connect(struct sock* s
>>>>> /* Walk through the addrs buffer and count the number of addresses. */
>>>>> addr_buf = kaddrs;
>>>>> while (walk_size < addrs_size) {
>>>>> +
>>>>> + /* Don't read out-of-bounds memory */
>>>>> + if (remaining < sizeof(union sctp_addr)) {
>>>>> + err = -EINVAL;
>>>>> + goto out_free;
>>>>> + }
>>>>> +
>>>>> sa_addr = (union sctp_addr *)addr_buf;
>>>>> af = sctp_get_af_specific(sa_addr->sa.sa_family);
>>>>> port = ntohs(sa_addr->v4.sin_port);
>>>>> @@ -1101,6 +1118,7 @@ static int __sctp_connect(struct sock* s
>>>>> addrcnt++;
>>>>> addr_buf += af->sockaddr_len;
>>>>> walk_size += af->sockaddr_len;
>>>>> + remaining -= af->sockaddr_len;
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>> /* In case the user of sctp_connectx() wants an association
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists