[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1283534877.2050.309.camel@laptop>
Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 19:27:57 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Mark Wielaard <mjw@...hat.com>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Naren A Devaiah <naren.devaiah@...ibm.com>,
Jim Keniston <jkenisto@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
"Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@...hat.com>,
Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv11 2.6.36-rc2-tip 5/15] 5: uprobes: Uprobes
(un)registration and exception handling.
On Fri, 2010-09-03 at 22:12 +0530, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
>
> 3. Ingo has a requirement for allowing normal users to use uprobes thro
> perf. When this feature gets implemented, we have to be careful about a
> normal users trying to just trace their application resulting in it
> hitting performance all other users.
For that I guess we should have a way to tie a uprobe to a filedesc or
somesuch, that way whenever the owner dies, the probe goes away.
Such probes would also obviuosly get a filter that limits it to tasks of
its own user etc..
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists