[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100903201024.GF4879@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2010 16:10:24 -0400
From: Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, hpa@...or.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tip:perf/urgent] perf, x86: Fix accidentally ack'ing a second
event on intel perf counter
On Fri, Sep 03, 2010 at 12:24:09PM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> > Let me know if this meets your needs.
> it should work. will test later
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Don
> >
> > @@ -371,6 +381,10 @@ unknown_nmi_error(unsigned char reason, struct pt_regs *regs)
> > reason, smp_processor_id());
> >
> > printk(KERN_EMERG "Do you have a strange power saving mode enabled?\n");
> > +#if defined(CONFIG_SYSCTL) && defined(CONFIG_X86_LOCAL_APIC)
> > + if (unknown_nmi_panic)
> > + die_nmi("", regs, 1);
> > +#endif
>
> can you move it before the two printk(KERN_EMERG...)?
Well, then you do not print a reason for the panic. Though the one printk
might not be useful.
>
> > if (panic_on_unrecovered_nmi)
> > panic("NMI: Not continuing");
>
> Can you merge those two panic?
I thought about it but did not want to disturb the panic vs die_nmi paths.
But I can definitely do that I think.
Cheers,
Don
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists