[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100903134814.b7129f7b.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2010 13:48:14 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>,
Hiroyuki Kamezawa <kamezawa.hiroyuki@...il.com>,
Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"Kleen, Andi" <andi.kleen@...el.com>,
Haicheng Li <haicheng.li@...ux.intel.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Mel Gorman <mel@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/2][BUGFIX] fix memory isolation notifier return value
check
On Fri, 3 Sep 2010 16:57:13 +0900
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
> Sorry, the 3rd patch for this set.
What happened with "[PATCH 2/2] Make is_mem_section_removable more
conformable with offlining code"? You mentioned sending an updated
one, but I can't immediately find it.
Also, please do describe the impact of the problems which are being
fixed. It helps me decide on priority and on
which-kernels-need-the-patch and it helps others when deciding
should-i-backport-this-into-my-kernel.
I think it'd be best to resend all of this, please.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists