linux-kernel - Re: [RFC/PATCH] notify user-level IRQ balancer when kernel assigns IRQ affinity

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 3 Sep 2010 14:25:45 -0700
From:	Arthur Kepner <akepner@....com>
To:	David Daney <ddaney@...iumnetworks.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] notify user-level IRQ balancer when kernel assigns
	IRQ affinity

On Fri, Sep 03, 2010 at 02:10:23PM -0700, David Daney wrote:
>> ---
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/Kconfig b/arch/Kconfig
>> index 4877a8c..65c79c7 100644
>> --- a/arch/Kconfig
>> +++ b/arch/Kconfig
>> @@ -158,4 +158,15 @@ config HAVE_PERF_EVENTS_NMI
>>   	  subsystem.  Also has support for calculating CPU cycle events
>>   	  to determine how many clock cycles in a given period.
>>
>> +config NOTIFY_USER_IRQ_BALANCER
>> +	bool "Notify user-level IRQ balancer (EXPERIMENTAL)"
>> +	default n
>> +	depends on NET&&  X86
>
> Missing a space before that '&&', but more importantly, what part of the  
> patch is x86 specific?
>
>

Hmmm. I see the space in my copy of the message.

Anyway, the X86 dependency is bogus. For a while there was such 
a dependency, but that's gone now. Just forgot to fix that up. 
Will do that now.

-- 
Arthur
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/