[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1283605142.9039.4.camel@ayu>
Date: Sat, 04 Sep 2010 08:59:02 -0400
From: Calvin Walton <calvin.walton@...il.com>
To: Florian Weimer <fweimer@....de>
Cc: miaox@...fujitsu.com, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>,
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Btrfs <linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Ext4 <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] lib: improve the performance of memcpy and memmove
of the general version
On Fri, 2010-09-03 at 11:03 +0000, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Miao Xie:
>
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL(memcpy);
>
> I think you need to change that to EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL, because the code
> is now licensed under the GPL, and not the GPL plus kernel exceptions
> (whatever they are, but they undoubtly exist), unlike the original
> implementation.
I wouldn't think so - the intent of EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL is to mark symbols
that make it obvious that a module was derived from the Linux kernel, as
opposed to some sort of generic driver that was just ported to a new
interface. (It's not foolproof, it's more of a warning to developers.)
If you think of it this way, memcpy is a function defined in the C
standard, there's absolutely nothing Linux-specific about using it.
Of course, IANAL; and you should probably grab some more opinions on the
matter.
--
Calvin Walton <calvin.walton@...il.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists