[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100904054511.GA12920@pengutronix.de>
Date: Sat, 4 Sep 2010 07:45:11 +0200
From: Wolfram Sang <w.sang@...gutronix.de>
To: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
Cc: Axel Lin <axel.lin@...il.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Luotao Fu <l.fu@...gutronix.de>, linux-input@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Input: stmpe-ts - return -ENOMEM if memory
allocation fail
On Fri, Sep 03, 2010 at 02:45:40PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 03, 2010 at 11:35:24PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 03, 2010 at 09:32:13AM +0800, Axel Lin wrote:
> > > Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@...il.com>
> >
> > Basically correct. Should be simpler to just use
> >
> > int ret = -ENOMEM;
> >
> > though.
> >
>
> No! I hate when people initialize error values like that, because it is
Might be a mileage; I don't insist, though :)
> so easy to miss the case and end up with wrong value. If the original
> version of the driver did not initialize it to 0 compiler would warn
> the author and the error would not make it into the mainline to begin
> with.
So, the initialization to 0 could be removed, at least.
> Please explicitly assign error codes in error handling path.
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (198 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists