linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -mm 0/8] unify dma_addr_t typedef (CONFIG_ARCH_DMA_ADDR_T

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20100904155738W.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Date:	Sat, 4 Sep 2010 15:58:51 +0900
From:	FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>
To:	akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc:	fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp, davem@...emloft.net,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm 0/8] unify dma_addr_t typedef
 (CONFIG_ARCH_DMA_ADDR_T_64BIT)

On Fri, 3 Sep 2010 15:09:48 -0700
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:

> Am I correct in believing that we can merge the first seven patches
> into arch trees at any time and, once they are all merged, patch 8/8
> can then go into mainline?

Yes. The first seven patches simply introduce
ARCH_DMA_ADDR_T_64BIT. They don't affect the existing code.

Thanks,
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/