[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4C83445B.4020103@redhat.com>
Date: Sun, 05 Sep 2010 10:18:51 +0300
From: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@...fujitsu.com>
CC: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, KVM <kvm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: don't sent IPI if the vcpu is not online
On 09/03/2010 07:12 AM, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
> It's no need sent IPI to the vcpu which is schedule out
>
>
> @@ -86,6 +86,7 @@ struct kvm_vcpu {
> unsigned long requests;
> unsigned long guest_debug;
> int srcu_idx;
> + bool online;
Why not check for guest_mode instead?
>
> int fpu_active;
> int guest_fpu_loaded, guest_xcr0_loaded;
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> index 9a73b98..998cbc8 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> @@ -148,8 +148,9 @@ static bool make_all_cpus_request(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned int req)
> raw_spin_lock(&kvm->requests_lock);
> me = smp_processor_id();
> kvm_for_each_vcpu(i, vcpu, kvm) {
> - if (kvm_make_check_request(req, vcpu))
> + if (kvm_make_check_request(req, vcpu) || !vcpu->online)
> continue;
> +
> cpu = vcpu->cpu;
> if (cpus != NULL&& cpu != -1&& cpu != me)
> cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, cpus);
btw, I think a more important optimization would be to drop
kvm->requests_lock. But I have no idea how to do it.
--
I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this
signature is too narrow to contain.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists