[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201009050953.52440.Martin@lichtvoll.de>
Date: Sun, 5 Sep 2010 09:53:41 +0200
From: Martin Steigerwald <Martin@...htvoll.de>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Paolo Ornati <ornati@...il.com>, "Ted Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
Subject: Re: help with git bisecting a bug 16376: random - possibly Radeon DRM KMS related - freezes
Am Mittwoch 01 September 2010 schrieb Paolo Ornati:
> On Tue, 31 Aug 2010 21:53:43 +0200
>
> Martin Steigerwald <Martin@...htvoll.de> wrote:
> > Obviously I am not interested in kernels prior 2.6.33. Should I just
> > do a "git bisect good" without trying the kernel or is there some
> > other remedy?
>
> No. Git is right in asking you to test that commit: you are ignoring
> branches and merges.
[...]
> So this this behaviour is normal :)
So as to the advice of Ted in the thread "stable? quality assurance?" I am
seeking some more help with bisecting this bug. I continued bisecting and
stumbled upon some problems:
Quite some kernels were unbootable with an ext4 and readahead related
backtrace[1]. These were all within an USB merge and after skipping about
five unbootable kernels I skipped the whole range of commits in it. I
wondered by git insisted taking me back to this range of commits, even in
the middle of two skips, instead of automatically re-adjusting the binary
search, so that range would not be hit again for a while. Cause then its
would have not been hit at all eventually. Anyway, I think this problem
got fixed prior to 2.6.34 so I am asking whether there is a patch, a commit
that fixed it in case I should stumble about such a unbootable kernel
again. I attached the backtrace screenshot to my bug comment[1]. Ted, I am
not booting from USB, but from the internal harddrive. I think these
backtraces are completely unrelated to that USB commits. I think the bug
has been introduced before that USB merge and fixed somewhen afterwards,
but from a quick glance I didn't find the commit that fixes it.
I am also seeking help with selecting more suitable commits to test: If
its a Radeon KMS related freeze and everything points at it, I think the
offending commit is in the first quarter of what git commit shows to me[2].
Thus I'd like to select one commit before those drm/kms related commits
and one after it, before testing any other commits. But I have been fooled
by those branches and merges before and there is the range of skipped
commits in that USB merge, thus I'd like advice on which commits to
select. A current git bisect log I attached to [2]. I will continue
bisecting as usual for the time being, but I really appreciate some help,
cause its still above 1800 commits to test otherwise and I am quite
annoyed by seeing the same roughly 11 steps even if the absolute number of
commits got down by about somewhat:
Bisecting: 1861 revisions left to test after this (roughly 11 steps)
[1] https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16376#c37
[2] https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16376#c38
Thanks,
--
Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de
GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7
Download attachment "signature.asc " of type "application/pgp-signature" (199 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists