linux-kernel - Re: stable? quality assurance?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4C835667.4010102@redhat.com>
Date:	Sun, 05 Sep 2010 11:35:51 +0300
From:	Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To:	Martin Steigerwald <Martin@...htvoll.de>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: stable? quality assurance?

  On 09/04/2010 07:38 PM, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> Am Sonntag 11 Juli 2010 schrieb Willy Tarreau:
>> Hi Martin,
> Hi Willy, hi everyone else reading this,
>

Interesting, how do you expect Willy to read this if you don't copy him?

Don't trim cc lists if you want people to read you email, especially on 
a high volume list like lkml.

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/