[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4C8360ED.8070700@kernel.org>
Date: Sun, 05 Sep 2010 11:20:45 +0200
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>
CC: x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86, percpu: Optimize this_cpu_ptr
Hello,
On 09/04/2010 07:21 PM, Brian Gerst wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/percpu.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/percpu.h
> index cd28f9a..d854438 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/percpu.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/percpu.h
> @@ -47,6 +47,15 @@
> #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> #define __percpu_arg(x) "%%"__stringify(__percpu_seg)":%P" #x
> #define __my_cpu_offset percpu_read(this_cpu_off)
> +#define __this_cpu_ptr(ptr) \
> +({ \
> + typeof(ptr) __ptr = (ptr); \
> + __verify_pcpu_ptr(ptr); \
> + asm volatile("add " __percpu_arg(1) ", %0" \
> + : "+r" (__ptr) \
> + : "m" (this_cpu_off)); \
> + __ptr; \
> +})
Great, thanks for doing this, but can you please comment on what
__this_cpu_ptr() optimizes above? Something similar to the patch
description but shorter.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists