linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Revert "drm/i915: fix vblank wait test condition"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20100905093758.GB23589@sucs.org>
Date:	Sun, 5 Sep 2010 10:37:59 +0100
From:	Sitsofe Wheeler <sitsofe@...oo.com>
To:	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>
Cc:	Sven Joachim <svenjoac@....de>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
	Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "drm/i915: fix vblank wait test condition"

On Sun, Sep 05, 2010 at 10:58:45AM +0300, Pekka Enberg wrote:
>
> I haven't heard of this problem. Is it reported on LKML? Is it a  
> regression from 2.6.35?

Yes I did report it on the LKML (the initial report is
http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/8/23/432 ) but I've being trying to track
other reports mentioning similar symptoms too (e.g. I mentioned the
previous link to you in http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/8/29/52 ) but it seems
like they might different. The Intel guys spent a good while doing
investigations and having me try patches which is what led to a half fix
( http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128267471015593&w=2 ) but there are
still situations which show problems (e.g. after suspend to ram).  I've
also created a bug on the xorg bugzilla (
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29857 ) which has more
debugging information. The problem is there are so many symptoms but
worse, the triggers are weird/marginal so it's hard to tell if it has
been fixed.

Yes it is a regression from 2.6.35 see
http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/8/24/132 where I bisected it down to commit
9d0498a2bf7455159b317f19531a3e5db2ecc9c4 .

-- 
Sitsofe | http://sucs.org/~sits/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/