[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100906123255.3eef4311@notabene>
Date: Mon, 6 Sep 2010 12:32:55 +1000
From: Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the rcu tree
On Mon, 6 Sep 2010 12:14:08 +1000
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> After merging the rcu tree, today's linux-next build
> (powerpc ppc64_defconfig) produced this warning:
>
> drivers/md/raid1.c: In function 'read_balance':
> drivers/md/raid1.c:445: warning: operation on 'new_disk' may be undefined
>
> I am picking on the rcu tree because the line above has not changed since
> 2005. The line is:
>
> for (rdev = rcu_dereference(conf->mirrors[new_disk].rdev);
> r1_bio->bios[new_disk] == IO_BLOCKED ||
> !rdev || !test_bit(In_sync, &rdev->flags)
> || test_bit(WriteMostly, &rdev->flags);
> rdev = rcu_dereference(conf->mirrors[++new_disk].rdev)) {
>
> Where new_disk is being updated in the parameter to the last
> rcu_dereference.
>
Hi Stephen,
There is a patch in linux-kernel
"PATCH] md: do not use ++ in rcu_dereference() argument"
that addresses this - it is a problem in md: I guess rcu as become more
helpful in finding these problems.
I'll probably fix it a little differently, but I'll have something in my
for-next for tomorrow.
Thanks,
NeilBrown
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists