[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100906144019.946d3c49.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Sep 2010 14:40:19 +0900
From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
To: "linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>, fengguang.wu@...el.com,
"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>, andi.kleen@...el.com,
Dave Hansen <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH 0/3] memory hotplug: updates and bugfix for is_removable
Problem:
/sys/devices/system/memory/memoryX/removable file shows whether the section
can be offlined or not. Returns "1" if it seems removable.
Now, the file uses a similar logic to one offline_pages() uses.
Problem here is.
- removable detection logics of is_removable() and offline_pages() is
different from each other.
- The logic, which check MIGRATE_TYPE, tend to be incorrect once fragmented.
MIGRATE_TYPE of a pageblock is just a hint, no guarantee.
Then, this patch set does.
- use the same logic between is_removable() and offline_pages().
- don't use MIGRATE_TYPE, check the memmap itself directly rather than hint.
Brief patch description:
1. bugfix for is_removable() check. I think this should be back ported.
2. bugfix for callback at counting immobile pages.
I think the old logic rarely hits this bug..so, not necessary to backport.
3. the unified new logic for is_remobable.
Only patch1 is CCed to stable for now and the patch series itself is onto
mmotm-08-27.
Thanks,
-Kame
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists