[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100907141112.GB6903@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2010 22:11:12 +0800
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: Linux Crypto Mailing List <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RFC: Crypto API User-interface
On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 10:06:46AM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 04:42:13PM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
> > Hi:
> >
> > This is what I am proposing for the Crypto API user-interface.
>
> Can you explain why we would ever want a userspace interface to it?
>
> doing crypto in kernel for userspace consumers sis simply insane.
> It's computational intensive code which has no business in kernel space
> unless absolutely required (e.g. for kernel consumers). In addition
> to that adding the context switch overhead and address space transitions
> is god awfull too.
>
> This all very much sounds like someone had far too much crack.
FWIW I don't care about user-space using kernel software crypto at
all. It's the security people that do.
The purpose of the user-space API is to export the hardware crypto
devices to user-space. This means PCI devices mostly, as things
like aesni-intel can already be used without kernel help.
Now as a side-effect if this means that we can shut the security
people up about adding another interface then all the better. But
I will certainly not go out of the way to add more crap to the
kernel for that purpose.
Cheers,
--
Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists