| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <55BC9463-95B9-4034-AA1E-55042D6E9354@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2010 16:57:17 +0100
From: Nick Lowe <nick.lowe@...il.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: AMD Geode NOPL emulation for kernel 2.6.36-rc2
In my opinion, this patch shouldn't be seen as a solution in the slightest. To me, it's a ugly hack and a kludge at best!
Abstractly a NOP is meant to be exactly as it says on the tin, a No Operation.
It's meant to do nothing at all - for a predefined number of clock cycles.
A NOP is commonly used for timing purposes, this completely breaks that contract surely?
NOPL is not standard i686, it was undocumented and has just been de facto supported since the Pentium Pro.
The solution is surely to ensure that when something is compiled for generic i686, NOPL is nowhere to be seen... Any compiler that does otherwise is broken.
For example, until recently, the basic semantics for choosing the NOP sequence were completely wrong in binutils. This has, finally, been fixed!
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2010-08/msg00057.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2010-08/msg00194.html
On 27 Aug 2010, at 19:10, Matteo Croce wrote:
> Hi,
> I have received many mails asking to refresh the patch so I decided to
> post them on the public mailing list
> In this version such feature is configurable via a kernel config option
>
> Signed-off-by: Matteo Croce <matteo@...nwrt.org>
>
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/Makefile 2010-08-27 00:27:50.101261000 +0200
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/Makefile 2010-08-27 00:31:11.391261002 +0200
> @@ -88,6 +88,8 @@
> obj-$(CONFIG_APB_TIMER) += apb_timer.o
>
> obj-$(CONFIG_K8_NB) += k8.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_GEODE_NOPL) += nopl_emu.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_GEODE_NOPL) += nopl_emu.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_DEBUG_RODATA_TEST) += test_rodata.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_DEBUG_NX_TEST) += test_nx.o
>
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c 2010-08-27 00:27:50.161261000 +0200
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c 2010-08-27 00:34:13.371261000 +0200
> @@ -137,11 +137,15 @@
> return;
> }
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_GEODE_NOPL
> if (c->x86_model == 10) {
> - /* AMD Geode LX is model 10 */
> - /* placeholder for any needed mods */
> + /* Geode only lacks the NOPL instruction to be i686,
> + but we can promote it to a i686 class cpu
> + and emulate NOPLs in the exception handler*/
> + boot_cpu_data.x86 = 6;
> return;
> }
> +#endif
> }
>
> static void __cpuinit amd_k7_smp_check(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/entry_32.S 2010-08-27 00:27:50.051261000 +0200
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/entry_32.S 2010-08-27 00:57:35.531261000 +0200
> @@ -978,7 +978,11 @@
> RING0_INT_FRAME
> pushl $0
> CFI_ADJUST_CFA_OFFSET 4
> +#ifdef CONFIG_GEODE_NOPL
> + pushl $do_nopl_emu
> +#else
> pushl $do_invalid_op
> +#endif
> CFI_ADJUST_CFA_OFFSET 4
> jmp error_code
> CFI_ENDPROC
> --- /dev/null 1970-01-01 00:00:00.000000000 +0000
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/nopl_emu.c 2010-08-27 00:27:57.881261002 +0200
> @@ -0,0 +1,110 @@
> +/*
> + * linux/arch/x86/kernel/nopl_emu.c
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 2002 Willy Tarreau
> + * Copyright (C) 2010 Matteo Croce
> + */
> +
> +#include <asm/processor.h>
> +#include <asm/traps.h>
> +
> +/* This code can be used to allow the AMD Geode to hopefully correctly execute
> + * some code which was originally compiled for an i686, by emulating NOPL,
> + * the only missing i686 instruction in the CPU
> + *
> + * Willy Tarreau <willy@...a-x.org>
> + * Matteo Croce <technoboy85@...il.co>
> + */
> +
> +static inline int do_1f(u8 *ip)
> +{
> + int length = 3;
> + switch (*ip) {
> + case 0x84:
> + if (!ip[5])
> + length++;
> + else
> + return 0;
> + case 0x80:
> + if (!ip[4] && !ip[3])
> + length += 2;
> + else
> + return 0;
> + case 0x44:
> + if (!ip[2])
> + length++;
> + else
> + return 0;
> + case 0x40:
> + if (!ip[1])
> + length++;
> + else
> + return 0;
> + case 0x00:
> + return length;
> + }
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static inline int do_0f(u8 *ip)
> +{
> + if (*ip == 0x1f)
> + return do_1f(ip + 1);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static inline int do_66(u8 *ip)
> +{
> + if (*ip == 0x90)
> + return 2;
> + if (*ip == 0x0f) {
> + int res = do_0f(ip + 1);
> + if (res)
> + return res + 1;
> + else
> + return 0;
> + }
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static inline int do_start(u8 *ip)
> +{
> + if (*ip == 0x0f)
> + return do_0f(ip + 1);
> + if (*ip == 0x66)
> + return do_66(ip + 1);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/* [do_nopl_emu] is called by exception 6 after an invalid opcode has been
> + * encountered. It will try to emulate it by doing nothing,
> + * and will send a SIGILL or SIGSEGV to the process if not possible.
> + * the NOPL can have variable length opcodes:
> +
> +bytes number opcode
> + 2 66 90
> + 3 0f 1f 00
> + 4 0f 1f 40 00
> + 5 0f 1f 44 00 00
> + 6 66 0f 1f 44 00 00
> + 7 0f 1f 80 00 00 00 00
> + 8 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00
> + 9 66 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00
> +*/
> +void do_nopl_emu(struct pt_regs *regs, long error_code)
> +{
> + u8 *ip = (u8 *)instruction_pointer(regs);
> + int res = do_start(ip);
> +
> + if (res) {
> + int i = 0;
> + do {
> + ip += res;
> + i++;
> + res = do_start(ip);
> + } while(res);
> + printk(KERN_DEBUG "geode_nopl: emulated %d instructions\n", i);
> + regs->ip = (typeof(regs->ip))ip;
> + } else
> + do_invalid_op(regs, error_code);
> +}
>
>
> --
> Matteo Croce
> OpenWrt developer
> Â _______Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â ________Â Â Â Â __
> Â |Â Â Â Â |.-----.-----.-----.|Â |Â |Â |.----.|Â |_
> Â |Â Â -Â Â ||Â _Â |Â -__|Â Â Â ||Â |Â |Â ||Â Â _||Â Â _|
> Â |_______||Â Â __|_____|__|__||________||__|Â |____|
> Â Â Â Â Â |__| W I R E L E S SÂ Â F R E E D O M
> Â KAMIKAZE (bleeding edge) ------------------
>  * 10 oz Vodka    Shake well with ice and strain
>  * 10 oz Triple sec mixture into 10 shot glasses.
>  * 10 oz lime juice Salute!
> Â ---------------------------------------------------
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists