linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][PATCH 13/19] perf: Per cpu-context rotation timer

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1283879247.1930.1629.camel@laptop>
Date:	Tue, 07 Sep 2010 19:07:27 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	paulus <paulus@...ba.org>
Cc:	stephane eranian <eranian@...glemail.com>,
	Robert Richter <robert.richter@....com>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
	Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>,
	Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@...el.com>,
	Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com>,
	Deng-Cheng Zhu <dengcheng.zhu@...il.com>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	tglx <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 13/19] perf: Per cpu-context rotation timer

On Tue, 2010-09-07 at 18:46 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:

> @@ -5904,6 +5930,9 @@ static void __init perf_event_init_all_c
>  
>                 cpuctx = &per_cpu(perf_cpu_context, cpu);
>                 __perf_event_init_context(&cpuctx->ctx, NULL);
> +               cpuctx->timer_interval = TICK_NSEC;
> +               hrtimer_init(&cpuctx->timer, CLOCK_MONOTONIC, HRTIMER_MODE_REL);
> +               cpuctx->timer.function = perf_event_context_tick;
>         }

> +static void perf_pmu_rotate_start(struct pmu *pmu)
> +{
> +       struct perf_cpu_context *cpuctx = &__get_cpu_var(perf_cpu_context);
> +
> +       if (hrtimer_active(&cpuctx->timer))
> +               return;
> +
> +       __hrtimer_start_range_ns(&cpuctx->timer,
> +                       ns_to_ktime(cpuctx->timer_interval), 0,
> +                       HRTIMER_MODE_REL, 0);
>  } 

This probably wants a fuzz factor that lets it fold into the tick we
already have. Thomas what's the easiest way to do that, give it a soft
limit of 1ns and hardlimit of TICK_NSEC?


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/