[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <8u3s94$geonkf@orsmga002.jf.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2010 18:37:55 +0100
From: Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>
To: Eric Anholt <eric@...olt.net>, Andy Isaacson <adi@...apodia.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Zou Nan hai <nanhai.zou@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [2.6.36-rc2 regression] X201s: resume-from-S2R hangs
On Tue, 07 Sep 2010 10:12:34 -0700, Eric Anholt <eric@...olt.net> wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Sep 2010 02:05:36 -0700, Andy Isaacson <adi@...apodia.org> wrote:
> > I have a Thinkpad X201s on which suspend-to-RAM was quite reliable until
> > after 2.6.36-rc1; with problematic kernels, suspend seems to work OK
> > (the machine goes to sleep with the moon LED steadily lit) but on resume
> > the LCD never lights up (and it's not just the backlight, the screen
> > isn't drawing at all) and the keyboard and network are dead. Nothing
> > makes it to syslog, either. The moon LED is turned off though.
> >
> > There seems to be some timing component to the problem -- some problem
> > kernels will suspend reliably 25% or 50% of the time and hang the rest.
> > There also seems to be some per-reboot state involved; one problem
> > kernel suspended successfully and survived 25 suspends in a row without
> > triggering a failure. (But after a reboot, the first suspend hung...)
> > Other problem kernels fail on 4 out of 4 reboots.
We introduced a timing regression which should be fixed by
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~ickle/drm-intel/ drm-intel-fixes
[http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~ickle/drm-intel/commit/?id=300387c0b57d75e5218e2881d6ad2720657a8bcf]
> > Bisecting is pretty hard under these conditions, but it seems to point
> > to
>
> Weird. That's exactly the hardware that I tested RC6 on, and I haven't
> seen a single resume failure on mine. Sounds like time to revert for
> this release.
At the moment we have a second resume regression that has been difficult to
reproduce, https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29406 :
commit d1b851fc0d105caa6b6e3e7c92d2987dfb52cbe0
Author: Zou Nan hai <nanhai.zou@...el.com>
Date: Fri May 21 09:08:57 2010 +0800
drm/i915: implement BSD ring buffer V2
The workaround for this is to #define HAS_BSD(dev) 0 [i915_drv.h].
Andy, can you try the workaround to see if this is the same issue in a
different guise?
Alternatively, we can be optimistic that it is just a timing issue fixed
in drm-intel-next. :)
Otherwise we will revert that patch. Thanks.
-Chris
--
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists