[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100907110254.C8F2.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2010 11:04:07 +0900 (JST)
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
Cc: kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com,
Kulikov Vasiliy <segooon@...il.com>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@...com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/14] mm: mempolicy: Check return code of check_range
> On Mon, 6 Sep 2010, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
>
> > I think both case is not happen in real. Am I overlooking anything?
>
> Its good to check the return code regardless. There is a lot of tinkering
> going on with that code.
OK. so, I'm convinced this is not -stable material.
Reviewed-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists