[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTikcdyNP8x28u3-m0oNcOqSek=xwUn3wW-=3sqnY@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2010 11:10:30 -0700
From: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>
To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
Cc: hpa@...or.com, fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@...el.com>,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>,
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/10] x86/VT-d: Make Intel VT-d IOMMU use IOMMU_INIT_* macros.
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 10:58 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
<konrad.wilk@...cle.com> wrote:
> We utilize the IOMMU_INIT macros to create this dependency:
...
> drivers/pci/dmar.c | 4 +++-
> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/dmar.c b/drivers/pci/dmar.c
> index 5fa64ea..4ef56a0 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/dmar.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/dmar.c
> @@ -36,6 +36,7 @@
> #include <linux/tboot.h>
> #include <linux/dmi.h>
> #include <linux/slab.h>
> +#include <asm/iommu_table.h>
This breaks ia64 - since you didn't make an asm/iommu_table.h for it :-(
Just copying the x86 one led to complaints about pci_swiotlb_detect_4gb()
not being declared ... so I think I need a bit more of the same infrastructure
you made of x86.
Pointers & hints please?
-Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists