[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4C8692DE.1020202@bluewatersys.com>
Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2010 07:30:38 +1200
From: Ryan Mallon <ryan@...ewatersys.com>
To: "avictor.za@...il.com" <avictor.za@...il.com>
CC: David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>,
Eric Miao <eric.y.miao@...il.com>,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, bn@...sdigital.com,
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@...osoft.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pio: add arch specific gpio_is_valid() function
avictor.za@...il.com wrote:
> hi,
>
>> NAK still. You're trying to abuse gpio_is_valid(),
>> which I see no need to support.
>>
>> In terms of GPIO framework architecture, zero is
>> the first GPIO in all cases, and is always
>> a valid GPIO number, even if it's not
>> requestable/swritable/readable on a given board.
>>
>> Whether it's usable on a given platform depends
>> on whether a GPIO controller is registered which
>> claims numbers 0..N ... (assuming gpiolib in use).
>
> How should the following be done in a driver then?
>
> if (gpio_is_valid(device->output_pin)) {
> if (gpio_request(device->output_pin, "driverX") != 0)
> goto error_handling;
>
> /* continue with gpio setup */
> }
> else {
> /* there is no vcc_pin, so don't do any gpio setup */
Adding:
device->output_pin = -EINVAL;
Will force the gpio to be invalid here, so that subsequent uses of
gpio_is_valid will behave as expected in the case where
device->output_pin >= 0, but doesn't map to a useable gpio.
> }
>
> ....
>
> if (gpio_is_valid(device->output_pin)) {
> /* set value high */
> }
~Ryan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists