[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100907023431.GB11972@kroah.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Sep 2010 19:34:31 -0700
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: Micha?? Nazarewicz <m.nazarewicz@...sung.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Daniel Walker <dwalker@...eaurora.org>,
FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>,
Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>,
Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>,
Pawel Osciak <p.osciak@...sung.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Zach Pfeffer <zpfeffer@...eaurora.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFCv5 0/9] CMA + VCMM integration
On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 03:40:46AM +0200, Micha?? Nazarewicz wrote:
> On Mon, 06 Sep 2010 23:09:05 +0200, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 08:33:50AM +0200, Michal Nazarewicz wrote:
>>> Hello everyone,
>>>
>>> This patchset introduces a draft of a redesign of Zach Pfeffer's
>>> VCMM.
>>
>> What is a VCMM?
>
> Virtual Contiguous Memory Manager. The version posted by Zach can
> be found at: <http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.mm/50090>.
> It is an API for managing IO MMU and IO MMU mappings.
>
>> What is a CMA?
>
> Contiguous Memory Manager. The v4 version can be found at
> <http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=128229799415817&w=2>. It is an API for
> allocating large, physically contiguous blocks of memory.
>
> I haven't expected that anyone who haven't already participated in the
> discussion about CMA and VCMM will get interested by this patchset
> so I was a bit vague in the cover letter. Sorry about that.
>
>>> Not all of the functionality of the original VCMM has been
>>> ported into this patchset. This is mostly meant as RFC. Moreover,
>>> the code for VCMM implementation in this RFC has not been tested.
>
>> If you haven't even tested it, why should we review it?
>
> Ignore the code then and look just at the documentation, please.
> I wanted to post what I have to receive comments about the general
> idea and not necessarily the code itself. Code is just a mean to show
> how I see the implementation of the idea described in the documentation.
> Because of all that, I marked the patchset as a RFC rather than a PATCH.
Oops, I looked at the code, sorry :)
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists