[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201009072247.18438.pedrogfrancisco@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2010 22:47:18 +0100
From: Pedro Francisco <pedrogfrancisco@...il.com>
To: Alejandro Riveira Fernández
<ariveira@...il.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.35.4: sudo rmmod ahci @ 2.6.35.4 succeeds: filesystem access errors follow
On Tuesday 07 September 2010 19:21:43 Alejandro Riveira Fernández wrote:
> El Tue, 7 Sep 2010 18:34:27 +0100
>
> Pedro Francisco <pedrogfrancisco@...il.com> escribió:
> > sudo rmmod ahci @ 2.6.35.4 succeeds: filesystem access errors follow.
> >
> > Now what I'm surprised is not the filesystem errors but me being allowed
> > to remove the module without using the '-f' option.
> >
> > Do note, lsmod |grep ahci reports something like [this is adapted from a
> > 2.6.32 kernel]:
> >
> > ahci 32200 0
> >
> > so it isn't at all surprising I'm being allowed to remove a seemingly
> > unused module. So....
> > a) is this supposed to happen?
>
> Yes afaics. root can do many stupid things if (s)he wants
> including « rm -rf --no-preserve-root / »
That makes no sense. That's what the force option "-f" is for. It's my opinion
the usage count for ahci on `lsmod' should be 1 and not 0. Whoever still wants
to remove it can use the `rmmod -f ahci'
>
> > b) do you need any more info?
> >
> > P.S.: CC'ing me will probably ensure I'll reply faster but not explicitly
> > needed since I'm subscribed.
--
Pedro
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists