[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <616992.75276.qm@web180302.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2010 16:44:55 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>
To: Ryan Mallon <ryan@...ewatersys.com>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: "avictor.za@...il.com" <avictor.za@...il.com>,
Eric Miao <eric.y.miao@...il.com>,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, bn@...sdigital.com,
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@...osoft.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pio: add arch specific gpio_is_valid() function
--- On Tue, 9/7/10, Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote:
> >
> > device->output_pin = -EINVAL;
>
> gpio numbers are unsigned in the rest of the API
Minor goof; should have been "int" everywhere,
as implied by the references to negative numbers
in the docs... negatives not used internally, but
preserved for external use (as above).
>
> It's unfortunate that 0 was used for a GPIO
Intentional: board schematics and chip docs can
easily match up to Linux this way. What would be
unfortunate is needing to map hardware docs into
software ones all the time -- error prone.
When the API is used correctly, it's not an issue.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists