[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100908091141.GA1377@kroah.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2010 02:11:41 -0700
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [patch 27/30] staging: Bulk convert the semaphore mess
On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 10:59:23AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Sep 2010, Greg KH wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 02:33:47PM -0000, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > init_MUTEX(_LOCKED) and DECLARE_MUTEX are going away. Bulk convert
> > > staging users.
> >
> > I don't think you actually built this change:
> >
> > > --- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/usbdux.c
> > > +++ linux-2.6/drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/usbdux.c
> > > @@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ struct usbduxsub {
> > > */
> > > static struct usbduxsub usbduxsub[NUMUSBDUX];
> > >
> > > -static DECLARE_MUTEX(start_stop_sem);
> > > +static DEFINE_SEMAPHORE(start_stop_sem);
> > >
> > > /*
> > > * Stops the data acquision
> >
> > I don't see DEFINE_SEMAPHORE() in Linus's tree, what should we use
> > instead?
>
> It's the first patch in the series, which I want to get Linus wards
> now, so this does not trip over.
Ah, that makes sense.
Well, it didn't hurt for me to take the other portions of this patch,
right?
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists