[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100908112835.GB7597@localhost>
Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2010 19:28:35 +0800
From: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
To: Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>
Cc: "linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/10] vmscan: Synchrounous lumpy reclaim use
lock_page() instead trylock_page()
On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 06:47:28PM +0800, Mel Gorman wrote:
> From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
>
> With synchrounous lumpy reclaim, there is no reason to give up to reclaim
> pages even if page is locked. This patch uses lock_page() instead of
> trylock_page() in this case.
>
> Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
> Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>
Acked-by: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists