[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1009081657550.2477@localhost6.localdomain6>
Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2010 17:05:12 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT pull] Preparatory patch for semaphore cleanup
On Wed, 8 Sep 2010, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 6:11 AM, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
> >
> > This patch just provides the DEFINE_SEMAPHORE macro which is required
> > for the various subsystem cleanups I sent out, so we can finally get
> > rid of init_MUTEX[_LOCKED] in 2.6.37.
>
> Why is it called DEFINE_SEMAPHORE(), when two lines later the we have
> DECLARE_MUTEX()?
DECLARE_MUTEX is what we want to get rid of.
It's a misnomer as the semaphores are not longer used as mutexes and
the instantiation of a variable is not the declaration.
> IOW, the whole DEFINE vs DECLARE thing seems confused. I'm not saying
> one is better than the other (maybe "define" is), but the mixing of
> names is worse than either, I feel..
That's a temporary situaton until all users are gone, which will be in
the 37 merge window.
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists