[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <F6CA58C781EF4D31B9DBCBBACC511DAD@stanford.edu>
Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2010 10:02:49 -0700
From: "David Cross" <david.cross@...ress.com>
To: "'Greg KH'" <greg@...ah.com>
Cc: <dhowells@...hat.com>, <linux-cachefs@...hat.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] Cachefiles, mpage_cleardirty addtition, west bridgerelated
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Greg KH [mailto:greg@...ah.com]
> On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 12:33:31PM -0700, David Cross wrote:
> > This patch adds the mpage_cleardirty function to the cachefiles
implementation in the kernel.
> > The purpose behind this patch is to allow for file based DMA through an
external DMA engine
> > without the data ever going through the process. The procedure for the
usage of this function
> > is as follows:
> > 1) User space allocates and maps a file
> > 2) external DMA device transfers the data to non-volatile storage
directly without it going through
> > the processor
> > 3) the "dirty" pages must be cleared and invalidated as they do not
contain correct information.
> >
> > I believe that David is the correct maintainer and am hoping that he is
willing to ACK this change. Please let me know
> > if there are any issues or concerns with this patch or if I should be
> > asking a different maintainer to ack.
> > Thanks,
> > David
> >
> > Signed-off-by: David Cross <david.cross@...ress.com>
> >
> > diff -uprN -X linux-next-vanilla/Documentation/dontdiff
linux-next-vanilla/fs/mpage.c linux-next-incl-sdk/fs/mpage.c
> > --- linux-next-vanilla/fs/mpage.c 2010-08-31 19:32:51.000000000 -0700
> > +++ linux-next-incl-sdk/fs/mpage.c 2010-09-07 11:52:39.000000000 -0700
> > @@ -716,3 +716,50 @@ int mpage_writepage(struct page *page, g
> > return ret;
> > }
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL(mpage_writepage);
> > +
> > +int mpage_cleardirty(struct address_space *mapping, int num_pages)
> > +{
> > + int ret = 0;
> > + int nr_pages;
> > + struct pagevec pvec;
> > + pgoff_t index = 0;
> > + pgoff_t end;
> > +
> > + pagevec_init(&pvec, 0);
> > + index = mapping->writeback_index;
> > + end = index + num_pages;
> > +
> > + while ((index <= end) &&
> > + (nr_pages = pagevec_lookup_tag(&pvec, mapping, &index,
> > + PAGECACHE_TAG_DIRTY, min(end - index,
> > + (pgoff_t)PAGEVEC_SIZE-1) + 1))) {
> > + unsigned i;
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < nr_pages; i++) {
> > + struct page *page = pvec.pages[i];
> > +
> > + lock_page(page);
> > + ret = clear_page_dirty_for_io(page);
> > + if (page_has_private(page))
> > + do_invalidatepage(page, 0);
> > +
> > + cancel_dirty_page(page, PAGE_CACHE_SIZE);
> > +
> > + remove_from_page_cache(page);
> > + ClearPageMappedToDisk(page);
> > + page_cache_release(page); /* pagecache ref */
> > + unlock_page(page);
> > +
> > + if (!ret) {
> > + printk(KERN_INFO "mpage_cleardirty: "
> > + "clear_page_dirty_for_io returned %d\n",
ret);
> > + return ret;
> > + }
> > + }
> > + pagevec_release(&pvec);
> > + cond_resched();
> > + }
> > +
> > + return ret;
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(mpage_cleardirty);
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL()?
Sure, but do I need to submit a new patch for this as well?
thanks,
david
---------------------------------------------------------------
This message and any attachments may contain Cypress (or its
subsidiaries) confidential information. If it has been received
in error, please advise the sender and immediately delete this
message.
---------------------------------------------------------------
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists