[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=VaR=UUYh3hzKdD+tvKuuTCD4b4qufQ03AWWxQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2010 19:19:49 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@...e.com>, tao.ma@...cle.com,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ocfs2-devel@....oracle.com
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] ocfs2 fixes for 2.6.36.
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 4:41 PM, Joel Becker <boel.becker@...cle.com> wrote:
>
> Here are the ocfs2 fixes we have ready for pulling right now. I
> have a bit of a procedural question, though. I've been busy, so Tao was
> kind enough to take the fixes I already had and apply all the new fixes.
> He coordinated testing them and getting them ready to go upstream.
> That's why I have his git tree in the pull request below.
> I wasn't sure how the signoffs work for this. He's got signoffs
> on the stuff he put together, because it's coming through his tree. My
> naive assumption is that this is the correct way to go.
The sign-off chain should basically stretch from the author to the
committer - so a good sign-off chain is one where the first sign-off
matches the author of the commit, and the last sign-off matches the
committer, and the ones in the middle are obviously the path it took
from one to the other.
However, Tao has *NOT* added sign-offs to the patches he's taken. I
didn't look at all of them, but the first few commits are all authored
(and signed off on - so far so good) by Mark Fasheh, but there is no
sign-off for Tao. So the sign-off chain is clearly not complete.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists