[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100907120046.C90A.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2010 11:44:07 +0900 (JST)
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [BUGFIX for 2.6.36][RESEND][PATCH 1/2] oom: remove totalpage normalization from oom_badness()
> ok, this one got no objection except original patch author.
> then, I'll push it to mainline. I'm glad that I who stabilization
> developer have finished this work.
>
> If you think this patch is slightly large, please run,
> % git diff a63d83f42^ mm/oom_kill.c
> you'll understand this is minimal revert of unnecessary change.
Andrew, please don't be lazy this one. I don't hope to slip this anymore.
I was making the patch as you requested. but no responce. I who stabilization
developr can't permit this userland breakage and sucky status. please
join to fix it. Sadly, The delay will be increase, I have to switch
full revert entirely instead your opinion.
Spell out: I don't hope to continus this crazy discussion. a userland
breakage bug is a bug, not anything else. I don't hope to talk this
one anymore even though it's only 5 miniture. I don't think any rare
usecase feature should die. but ZERO USER FEATURE SHOULDN'T BREAK USERLAND.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists