[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 09 Sep 2010 13:00:59 +0200
From: Jens Axboe <jaxboe@...ionio.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>,
"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"James.Bottomley@...e.de" <James.Bottomley@...e.de>,
"linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.36-rc3: EIP is at scsi_init_io+...
On 2010-09-09 02:12, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Hmm. No noise about this one.
>
> Jens, Fujita, James, any comments?
>
> On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 11:46 AM, Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com> wrote:
>> Not much of a calltrace, it scrolled away because of hardlockup detector.
>> On the bright side, radeon KMS worked correctly and actually showed it.
>>
>> $ addr2line -e vmlinux ffffffff812d207b
>> drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c:1015
>>
>> 1012 err_exit:
>> 1013 scsi_release_buffers(cmd);
>> 1014 scsi_put_command(cmd);
>> 1015 ===> cmd->request->special = NULL; <===
>> 1016 return error;
>> 1017 }
>> 1018 EXPORT_SYMBOL(scsi_init_io);
>
> I do have to say that it looks rather wrong that it accesses "cmd"
> after it has done the "scsi_put_command(cmd)" on it.
>
> I also note that that was introduced pretty recently by commit
> 610a63498f7 ("scsi: fix discard page leak"), merged during this merge
> window. That does look suspicious to me.
Agree, that's clearly a bug. That assignment should just go away.
--
Jens Axboe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists