[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2010 15:40:48 -0400
From: Mike Frysinger <vapier.adi@...il.com>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [rfc patch] treewide: Convert "static const char <*> foo[] =" to
"static const char <*> const foo[] ="
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 15:33, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-09-09 at 15:16 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 14:48, Joe Perches wrote:
>> > could be warned by checkpatch
>> i dont think you even need to check the contents. just match the base:
>> char foo[]
>> const char *foo[]
>> we want to catch these even if it isnt static, and catching the
>> forward decl would be useful too.
>
> I think that's not so good.
> There are times when a default is used but then modified.
>
> For instance:
> drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/comedi_bond.c: char file[] = "/dev/comediXXXXXX";
how many hits of non-static (i.e. ones that are extern) that should be
const but arent ?
>> your perl hack isnt quite right.
>
> The script I posted doesn't eat that whitespace.
> The diff I sent you did. I wouldn't post that.
>
>> how about making a coccinelle patch ?
>
> Not necessary I think.
> If Julia or anyone else wants to, no objection.
but people splitting the decl wouldnt be caught by your checks ...
coccinelle should catch it.
static char *
some_really_long_name[] = {
...
};
but if there arent any hits in the tree like this, guess it doesnt matter
-mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists