linux-kernel - Re: [RFC] annotating the remaining BKL users

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20100908.205320.191416862.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Wed, 08 Sep 2010 20:53:20 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Cc:	arnd@...db.de, fweisbec@...il.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
	jkacur@...hat.com, sam@...nborg.org, jblunck@...e.de,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] annotating the remaining BKL users

From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2010 17:20:57 -0700

> That said, I'd also like to see a comment _why_ the architectures in
> question depends on the BKL. Some of those look pretty historical (the
> sparc32 register window spill code? Does it _really_ need the BKL at
> all, or is that just a remnant of "let's get the BKL at each kernel
> entry").

It probably doesn't or can be trivially removed.

I'll have a go at this.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/