lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 9 Sep 2010 10:00:28 +0200
From:	Christof Schmitt <christof.schmitt@...ibm.com>
To:	Anil kumar <anils_r@...oo.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: scsi_cmnd data_buffer checksum

On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 08:36:32PM -0700, Anil kumar wrote:
> 
> I am writing a checksum calculation of scsi_cmnd data buffer in the driver. 
> 
> I calculate the checksum of the scsi_cmd data buffer(request_buffer) in driver queuecommand.
> 
> Now when the command is completed from the hardware and before driver sends it back to mid-layer, I calculate the checksum again of the same scsi_cmd data_buffer again.
> 
> Sometimes the checksums don't match. I mean somehow looks like OS changed the scsi_cmd data_buffer(request_buffer) in the meantime when driver is working on the command.
> I print the address of the scsi_cmd data_buffer (virtual address) and its same and the contents of the buffer is also same during both the calculations.
> 
> Can this happen?

Yes. While a write I/O is being processed in Linux or in flight, the
data buffers can change. This causes problems for other checksums as
well; i ran into this when looking at the DIF/DIX checksums for SCSI
commands.

At the moment, this problem can be avoided e.g. by running only direct
I/O on the xfs filesystem. There have been discussions about this, a
short summary is here, look for "stable pages":
http://lwn.net/Articles/399148/

Christof
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ