[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2010 15:39:09 +0530
From: Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Mark Hills <mark@...o.org.uk>
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: cgroup: rmdir() does not complete
* Mark Hills <mark@...o.org.uk> [2010-09-09 11:01:45]:
> On Thu, 2 Sep 2010, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
>
> [...]
> > But hmm...it's curious who holds mutex and what happens.
>
> I have a system showing the failure case (but still do not have a way to
> reliably repeat it)
>
> Here are the two processes:
>
> 23586 pts/0 RL+ 5059:18 /net/homes/mhills/tmp/soaked-cgroup
> 23685 pts/6 DL+ 0:00 /net/homes/mhills/tmp/soaked-cgroup
>
> 23586 spends almost all of its time in 'RL+' status, occasionally it is
> seen in 'DL+' status.
>
> From my analysis before, both are blocked on rmdir(), but one is spinning,
> holding the lock on the /cgroup, and the other is waiting for the lock. If
> I strace 23586 then the rmdir() fails with EINTR.
>
Any chance you can compile with debug cgroup subsystem and get
information from there?
--
Three Cheers,
Balbir
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists