[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4C89EF37.5080803@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2010 10:41:27 +0200
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu, paulus@...ba.org,
davem@...emloft.net, fweisbec@...il.com,
perfmon2-devel@...ts.sf.net, eranian@...il.com,
robert.richter@....com, acme@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] perf_events: add support for per-cpu per-cgroup
monitoring (v3)
Hello,
On 09/10/2010 10:16 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-09-09 at 23:41 +0200, Stephane Eranian wrote:
>>> alloc_percpu() is zalloc_percpu() in fact, memory is already cleared.
>>>
>> I remember thinking about this and trying to trace to the code down
>> to figure this out. But it is rather complicated. If alloc_percpu() always
>> clears the memory, then I think that calling is zalloc_percpu()
>> would be more helpful....
Maybe but at this point it might be a bit too late. The allocator has
been that way since the beginning.
> pcpu_populate_chunk() in mm/percpu-vm.c does indeed do that memset, the
> one in mm/percpu-km.c does not.
>
> It is not obviously clear to me the -km allocator does indeed result in
> zero filled memory.
Nice catch. Fortunately, the -km allocator isn't currently being used
in upstrea although it was enabled for linux-next a couple of days
ago. I'll fix it up.
Thank you.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists