[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4C89F1AB.3070701@warmcat.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2010 09:51:55 +0100
From: Andy Green <andy@...mcat.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Generic GPIO on USB / hotpluggable gpiolib device
Hi -
I just wrote a small driver that exposes a USB device's IO as generic
GPIO using a little protocol. I often needed a simple way to bitbang
something from my laptop and this is going to be very useful to
implement it.
It works fine with dynamic GPIO allocation and so on, but I maybe
realized at the end why nobody did this until now, in gpiolib it says...
/**
* gpiochip_remove() - unregister a gpio_chip
* @chip: the chip to unregister
*
* A gpio_chip with any GPIOs still requested may not be removed.
*/
int gpiochip_remove(struct gpio_chip *chip)
{
...
for (id = chip->base; id < chip->base + chip->ngpio; id++) {
if (test_bit(FLAG_REQUESTED, &gpio_desc[id].flags)) {
status = -EBUSY;
break;
}
}
...
In short gpiolib doesn't have the concept that the chip can be
hot(un)plugged randomly, including at times when something has requested
the GPIO.
I am quite certain that USB generic GPIO would be something very nice
for end users, to be able to casually plug in even the cheapest USB
micro and bitbang as much GPIO as you like from userspace in a
standardized way (including being able to exploit the existing bitbang
protocol drivers on the exposed GPIO) would be very handy. The protocol
is simple and flexible (1 x IN endpoint and 1 x OUT endpoint, only one
packet per call, device announces number of GPIO it supports).
What'd be the feeling if I enhanced gpiolib a bit along the lines of:
- changing the chip set() function to be able to return errors, at the
moment it's void return from that
- adding a flag marking a chip as "dead", causing all IO via it to
fail immediately and it to be auto-removed when the last request goes
Does this seem workable? What to do about say SPI bitbang protocol
driver instance that sees its generic gpio calls started failing?
-Andy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists