[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100910093135.GB10179@riccoc20.at.omicron.at>
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2010 11:31:35 +0200
From: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
To: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-api@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] posix clocks: introduce a sysfs presence.
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 12:00:08AM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> Also we have existing time sources that don't follow the poxix clock
> model - I can open /dev/rtc and I can open the hpet and so on.
>
> I like /sys/class/time* *but* you need to be able to open the sysfs
> device and apply operations to it in order for it to work when your closk
> can be dynamically created and destroyed and to get a sane Unix API.
>
> To start with try applying permissions to clock sources via the POSIX
> API. That is something that will be required for some applications.
>
> I need to be able to open sys/clock/foo/something and get a meaningful
> handle. Sure it's quite likely the operations it supports are related to
> the POSIX timer ops.
Do you mean this:
id = read(/sys/clock/foo/lock); /* clock is busy, cannot be removed */
...
clock_gettime(id, ts);
...
write(/sys/clock/foo/release, id); /* all done with clock */
I am not sure what you are describing. Can you give an example, like
pseudocode or something?
Thanks,
Richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists