[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100910163004.5621dbc8@basil.nowhere.org>
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2010 16:30:04 +0200
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: Naoya Horiguchi <nao.horiguchi@...il.com>
Cc: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] hugetlb, rmap: fixes and cleanups
On Fri, 10 Sep 2010 20:47:59 +0900
Naoya Horiguchi <nao.horiguchi@...il.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 11:04:38AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > On Fri, 10 Sep 2010 13:23:02 +0900
> > Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > These are fix and cleanup patches for hugepage rmapping.
> > > All these were pointed out in the following thread (last 4
> > > messages.)
> > >
> > > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.mm/52334
> >
> > Looks all good to me. It's not strictly hwpoison related
> > though, so I assume they are better with Andrew than my tree.
>
> Agreed.
>
> > I assume they do not depend on the earlier patchkit?
>
> No, all changes on this patchset update code merged with
> "HWPOISON for hugepage" patchset.
Ok then it's better for me to carry it anyways, otherwise Andrew
will be in dependency hell.
I will need some acks from MM hackers though. Anyone?
-Andi
--
ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists