linux-kernel - [PATCH] x86: fix duplicate calls of the nmi handler

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 10 Sep 2010 17:56:59 +0200
From:	Robert Richter <robert.richter@....com>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC:	Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	"gorcunov@...il.com" <gorcunov@...il.com>,
	"fweisbec@...il.com" <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"ying.huang@...el.com" <ying.huang@...el.com>,
	"ming.m.lin@...el.com" <ming.m.lin@...el.com>,
	"yinghai@...nel.org" <yinghai@...nel.org>,
	"andi@...stfloor.org" <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	"eranian@...gle.com" <eranian@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH] x86: fix duplicate calls of the nmi handler

On 10.09.10 10:46:34, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > I'll look at getting a trace of the thing, but if any of you has a
> > > bright idea...

I found another patch in my queue, which fixes a duplicate call of the
nmi handler. Since I could not yet reproduce the bug, I am not sure if
this fixes the problem, but it is worth a try.

-Robert

--

>From 037678d4231778c55ed1a19b53d24c7056ae8bbd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Robert Richter <robert.richter@....com>
Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2010 20:45:51 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] x86: fix duplicate calls of the nmi handler

The commit:

 e40b172 x86: Move notify_die from nmi.c to traps.c

moved the nmi handler call to default_do_nmi(). DIE_NMI_IPI and
DIE_NMI are called subsequently now. If the return code is
!NOTIFY_STOP, then the handlers are called twice. This patch fixes
this.

Signed-off-by: Robert Richter <robert.richter@....com>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/apic/hw_nmi.c    |    1 -
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c |    1 -
 arch/x86/oprofile/nmi_int.c      |    1 -
 3 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/hw_nmi.c b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/hw_nmi.c
index cefd694..61a3ad7 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/hw_nmi.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/hw_nmi.c
@@ -52,7 +52,6 @@ arch_trigger_all_cpu_backtrace_handler(struct notifier_block *self,
 	int cpu = smp_processor_id();
 
 	switch (cmd) {
-	case DIE_NMI:
 	case DIE_NMI_IPI:
 		break;
 
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
index 3efdf28..87dc9e2 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
@@ -1219,7 +1219,6 @@ perf_event_nmi_handler(struct notifier_block *self,
 		return NOTIFY_DONE;
 
 	switch (cmd) {
-	case DIE_NMI:
 	case DIE_NMI_IPI:
 		break;
 	case DIE_NMIUNKNOWN:
diff --git a/arch/x86/oprofile/nmi_int.c b/arch/x86/oprofile/nmi_int.c
index cfe4faa..e0132bf 100644
--- a/arch/x86/oprofile/nmi_int.c
+++ b/arch/x86/oprofile/nmi_int.c
@@ -64,7 +64,6 @@ static int profile_exceptions_notify(struct notifier_block *self,
 	int ret = NOTIFY_DONE;
 
 	switch (val) {
-	case DIE_NMI:
 	case DIE_NMI_IPI:
 		if (ctr_running)
 			model->check_ctrs(args->regs, &__get_cpu_var(cpu_msrs));
-- 
1.7.1.1



> > 
> > What are you running to create the problem?  I can try and duplicate 
> > it here.
> 
> It happens easily here - just running something like:
> 
>    perf record -g ./hackbench 10
> 
> a couple of times triggers it. Note, unlike with the earlier bug, the 
> NMIs are not permanently 'stuck' - and everything continues working. 
> Obviously the messages are nasty looking so this is a regression we need 
> to fix.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> 	Ingo
> 

-- 
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
Operating System Research Center

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/