| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20100910184158.GA12787@rakim.wolfsonmicro.main> Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2010 19:41:58 +0100 From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com> To: Mattias WALLIN <mattias.wallin@...ricsson.com> Cc: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: SV: SV: [PATCH 2/3] MFD: AB8500 debugfs On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 08:27:38PM +0200, Mattias WALLIN wrote: Please fix your mail client to word wrap within paragraphs. > >Pretty much; probably needs to be slightly more involved than that to > >make sure the selection lines up with the core but certainly the same > >effect for users. > Sorry I don't follow. If CONFIG_DEBUG_FS=y but the chip core is built as a module your suggested change would try to build the debugfs code into the kernel linking against symbols defined in the module. > But after thinking about it I realize that only changing the Makefile > is not a good idea > I need ifdefs in the .c file for avoiding build problems. Isn't the > first solution with Kconfig better? I don't see what relevance of these two points to each other? You can check for CONFIG_DEBUG_FS just as easily as for the new Kconfig symbol you added. No matter what you do you need ifdefs in the code. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists