[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100910235022.74ec04de@basil.nowhere.org>
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2010 23:50:22 +0200
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] hugetlb, rmap: always use anon_vma root pointer
On Fri, 10 Sep 2010 10:19:24 -0700
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 9:23 PM, Naoya Horiguchi
> <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com> wrote:
> > This patch applies Andrea's fix given by the following patch into
> > hugepage rmapping code:
> >
> > commit 288468c334e98aacbb7e2fb8bde6bc1adcd55e05
> > Author: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>
> > Date: Mon Aug 9 17:19:09 2010 -0700
> >
> > This patch uses anon_vma->root and avoids unnecessary overwriting
> > when anon_vma is already set up.
>
> Btw, why isn't the code in __page_set_anon_rmap() also doing this
> cleaner version (ie a single "if (PageAnon(page)) return;" up front)?
Perhaps I misunderstand the question, but __page_set_anon_rmap
should handle Anon pages, shouldn't it?
>
> The comments in that function are also some alien language translated
> to english by some broken automatic translation service. Could
> somebody clean up that function and come up with a comment that
> actually parses as English and makes sense?
I'll do that.
-Andi
--
ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists