[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <000c01cb507e$e8d0a3c0$66f8800a@maildom.okisemi.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2010 09:27:05 +0900
From: "Masayuki Ohtake" <masa-korg@....okisemi.com>
To: "Linus Walleij" <linus.ml.walleij@...il.com>
Cc: "Grant Likely" <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>, <meego-dev@...go.com>,
"LKML" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"David Brownell" <dbrownell@...rs.sourceforge.net>,
<qi.wang@...el.com>, <yong.y.wang@...el.com>,
<andrew.chih.howe.khor@...el.com>, <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
<gregkh@...e.de>, "Tomoya MORINAGA" <morinaga526@....okisemi.com>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"David Woodhouse" <dwmw2@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [MeeGo-Dev][PATCH] Topcliff: Update PCH_SPI driver to 2.6.35
Hi Linus,
Thank you for your checking.
> If you incluse ChangeLogs it's easier to follow the development,
> thanks.
The latest patch has included the following Changelog.
> Topcliff PCH is the platform controller hub that is going to be used in
> Intel's upcoming general embedded platform. All IO peripherals in
> Topcliff PCH are actually devices sitting on AMBA bus.
> Topcliff PCH has SPI I/F. Using this I/F, it is able to access system
> devices connected to SPI.
Do you mean the above our Changelog is lack of something ?
Thanks, Ohtake(OKISemi)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Linus Walleij" <linus.ml.walleij@...il.com>
To: "Masayuki Ohtake" <masa-korg@....okisemi.com>
Cc: "Grant Likely" <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>; <meego-dev@...go.com>; "LKML" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>; "David
Brownell" <dbrownell@...rs.sourceforge.net>; <qi.wang@...el.com>; <yong.y.wang@...el.com>;
<andrew.chih.howe.khor@...el.com>; <arjan@...ux.intel.com>; <gregkh@...e.de>; "Tomoya MORINAGA"
<morinaga526@....okisemi.com>; "Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@...utronix.de>; "David Woodhouse" <dwmw2@...radead.org>
Sent: Friday, September 10, 2010 5:58 AM
Subject: Re: [MeeGo-Dev][PATCH] Topcliff: Update PCH_SPI driver to 2.6.35
> 2010/9/3 Masayuki Ohtake <masa-korg@....okisemi.com>:
>
> > Each instance of our SPI device has the same vendor ID and device ID.
> > Thus, I think it is impossible to be called probe() for each instance.
>
> Looking at you latest patch it appears you could :-)
> That solves the problem pretty nicely.
> If you incluse ChangeLogs it's easier to follow the development,
> thanks.
>
> Linus Walleij
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists