[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1284100327.24986.324.camel@Joe-Laptop>
Date: Thu, 09 Sep 2010 23:32:07 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Masayuki Ohtake <masa-korg@....okisemi.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>,
John Linn <john.linn@...inx.com>,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
Kristoffer Glembo <kristoffer@...sler.com>,
Maxime Bizon <mbizon@...ebox.fr>,
Greg Rose <gregory.v.rose@...el.com>,
ML netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, MeeGo <meego-dev@...go.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>,
Jili Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>,
FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>,
"Wang, Qi" <qi.wang@...el.com>,
"Wang, Yong Y" <yong.y.wang@...el.com>,
Andrew <andrew.chih.howe.khor@...el.com>,
Intel OTC <joel.clark@...el.com>,
"Foster, Margie" <margie.foster@...el.com>,
Arjan <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
Toshiharu Okada <okada533@....okisemi.com>,
Takahiro Shimizu <shimizu394@....okisemi.com>,
Tomoya Morinaga <morinaga526@....okisemi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] Gigabit Ethernet driver of Topcliff PCH
On Fri, 2010-09-10 at 14:29 +0900, Masayuki Ohtake wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/net/pch_gbe/pch_gbe_ethtool.c b/drivers/net/pch_gbe/pch_gbe_ethtool.c
[]
> +static void pch_gbe_get_regs(struct net_device *netdev,
> + struct ethtool_regs *regs, void *p)
> +{
> + struct pch_gbe_adapter *adapter = netdev_priv(netdev);
> + struct pch_gbe_hw *hw = &adapter->hw;
> + struct pci_dev *pdev = adapter->pdev;
> + u32 *regs_buff = p;
> + u16 i, reg, tmp;
> +
> + regs->version = pdev->revision;
> + regs->version = 0x1000000 | (regs->version << 16) | pdev->device;
Might be simpler as:
regs->version = 0x1000000 | (__u32)pdev->revision << 16 | pdev->device;
The block below is a bit confusing to me.
> + memset(p, 0, PCH_GBE_REGS_LEN * (int)sizeof(u32));
It seems the memset is unnecessary as it's completely
overwritten below.
> + for (i = 0; i < PCH_GBE_MAC_REGS_LEN; i++)
> + regs_buff[i] = ioread32(&hw->reg->INT_ST + i);
> + /* PHY register */
> + for (i = PCH_GBE_MAC_REGS_LEN, reg = 0; reg < PCH_GBE_PHY_REGS_LEN;
> + i++, reg++) {
> + pch_gbe_hal_read_phy_reg(&adapter->hw, reg, &tmp);
> + regs_buff[i] = tmp;
> + }
I think i'd be simpler to do something like:
for (i = 0; i < PCH_GBE_MAC_REGS_LEN; i++)
*regs_buff++ = ioread32(&hw->reg->INT_ST + i);
/* PHY register */
for (i = 0; i < PCH_GBE_PHY_REGS_LEN; i++) {
pch_gbe_hal_read_phy_reg(&adapter->hw, i, &tmp);
*regs_buff++ = tmp;
}
[]
+void pch_gbe_mac_mar_set(struct pch_gbe_hw *hw, u8 * addr, u32 index)
> +{
> + u32 mar_low, mar_high, adrmask;
> +
> + pr_debug("index : 0x%x\n", index);
> +
> + /*
> + * HW expects these in little endian so we reverse the byte order
> + * from network order (big endian) to little endian
> + */
> + mar_high = ((u32) addr[0] | ((u32) addr[1] << 8) |
> + ((u32) addr[2] << 16) | ((u32) addr[3] << 24));
> + mar_low = ((u32) addr[4] | ((u32) addr[5] << 8));
> + /* Stop the MAC Address of index. */
> + adrmask = ioread32(&hw->reg->ADDR_MASK);
> + iowrite32((adrmask | (0x0001 << index)), &hw->reg->ADDR_MASK);
> + /* wait busy */
> + while ((ioread32(&hw->reg->ADDR_MASK) & PCH_GBE_BUSY)) {
> + int tmp = 0;
> + udelay(20);
> + tmp++;
> + if (tmp == 1000) {
> + pr_err("Address mask bit is not cleared\n");
> + break;
> + }
> + }
You need to move the declaration of tmp out of the while.
Do these really need to be busy-waits?
> + /* Set the MAC address to the MAC address 1A/1B register */
> + iowrite32(mar_high, &hw->reg->mac_adr[index].high);
> + iowrite32(mar_low, &hw->reg->mac_adr[index].low);
> + /* Start the MAC address of index */
> + iowrite32((adrmask & ~(0x0001 << index)), &hw->reg->ADDR_MASK);
> + /* wait busy */
> + while ((ioread32(&hw->reg->ADDR_MASK) & PCH_GBE_BUSY)) {
> + int tmp = 0;
> + udelay(20);
> + tmp++;
> + if (tmp == 1000) {
> + pr_err("Address mask bit is not cleared\n");
> + break;
> + }
> + }
> +}
Here too. There are more of these too I'm not listing.
Perhaps you could review the logic a bit more.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists