[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100910065930.GE31090@elte.hu>
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2010 08:59:30 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Jack Steiner <steiner@....com>, John Stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: tglx@...utronix.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86, UV: Improve access time to RTC clock in node
controller
* Jack Steiner <steiner@....com> wrote:
> UV has a globally synchronized clock (UV RTC) that is located in the node
> controller chip of each blade. Although any cpu can access it's own RTC
> without making offnode references, access to a register in the node
> controller still requires a few hundred nsec. This is problematic for
> some workloads.
>
> This patch changes the clock code so that the RTC value is calculated
> based on the in-core TSC clock. Access to the TSC is much faster than
> access to the RTC.
> OLD: 292 nsec
> NEW: 18 nsec
Impressive speedup!
>
>
> Periodically, a pair of TSC/RTC values is read. New requests to read the
> RTC will read the current TSC, then calculate an RTC value
> based on the TSC delta from the last sync point and the ratio of TSC to
> RTC frequencies.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jack Steiner <steiner@....com>
> Reviewed-by: Robin Holt <holt@....com>
>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/uv_time.c | 494 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 473 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>
> Index: linux/arch/x86/kernel/uv_time.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux.orig/arch/x86/kernel/uv_time.c 2010-09-09 14:02:09.000000000 -0500
> +++ linux/arch/x86/kernel/uv_time.c 2010-09-09 14:03:32.302037155 -0500
> @@ -15,12 +15,14 @@
> * along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
> * Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307 USA
> *
> - * Copyright (c) 2009 Silicon Graphics, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
> + * Copyright (c) 2009-2010 Silicon Graphics, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
> * Copyright (c) Dimitri Sivanich
> */
> #include <linux/clockchips.h>
> #include <linux/slab.h>
> +#include <linux/sysfs.h>
>
> +#include <asm/timer.h>
> #include <asm/uv/uv_mmrs.h>
> #include <asm/uv/uv_hub.h>
> #include <asm/uv/bios.h>
> @@ -29,8 +31,137 @@
> #include <asm/cpu.h>
>
> #define RTC_NAME "sgi_rtc"
> +#define RTC_NAME_CALC "sgi_rtc_calc"
> +
> +/*
> + * On UV, the latency to read the hardware RTC clock is ~300 nsec.
> + * Numerous workloads show this to be a performance issue.
> + *
> + * The following code changes the RTC access code to read the TSC
> + * instead of the RTC. Based on the current TSC and the ratio
> + * of TSC to RTC frequency, the code calculates the RTC value.
> + *
> + * The following are the requirements for the algorithms that
> + * calculate the RTC value:
> + * - a cpu will never see it's own RTC value go backward
> + * - the error in the calculation of the RTC value must be
> + * less than the time required to bounce a cacheline between
> + * cpus. For example cpu A must not be allowed to
> + * - read a RTC value
> + * - write it to memory
> + * - have cpu B read A's RTC value
> + * - cpu B read it's own RTC value
> + * - B's RTC is less than A's
> + * Or saying this another way, no pair of cpus can
> + * perceive time to go backward.
> + *
> + * Assumptions:
> + * - RTCs are synchronized across all blades. Any cpu reading
> + * it's own RTC will see the same value.
> + * - TSCs on a blade are synchronized
> + * - TSCs on different blades are NOT synchronized
> + * - TSCs on different blades may run at different frequencies
> + * (UV supports SSIs with mixed processor types & running
> + * at different core frequencies)
> + * - clock frequencies of TSC vs RTC may drift but at a
> + * slow rate. No significant change over a period of a
> + * few 10's of seconds.
> + * - don't do divide instructions in the critical path
> + *
> + * Tables:
> + *
> + * RTC Blade Control (RBC) - Per blade tables allocated blade local
> + * (2 processor sockets on each blade)
> + *
> + * +-----------+ +-----------+
> + * ' RBC ' ' RBC '
> + * ' ' ' '
> + * +-----------+ +-----------+
> + * ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^
> + * / | \ / | \
> + * / | \ / | \
> + * / | \ / | \
> + * +-----+ +------ ------- +-----+ +-----+ +-----+
> + * ' RCC ' ' RCC ' ' RCC ' ' RCC ' ' RCC ' ' RCC '
> + * +-----+ +-----+ +-----+ +-----+ +-----+ +-----+
> + *
> + * RTC Cpu Control (RCC) - Per-cpu tables allocated socket-local
> + *
> + *
> + * RBC contain per-blade state:
> + * - recent RTC/TSC pair. Current RTC value is
> + * calculated by reading the live TSC, then calculating
> + * the current RTC value based on the TSC delta.
> + * - fixed-point (32.32) multiplier:
> + * rtc_delta = (tsc delta) * fixmult
> + * - RTC/TSC pair for time when fixmult was last calculated
> + * - TSC intervals for resyncing the recent RTC/TSC pair
> + * or for recalculating the fixmult multiplier
> + *
> + * RCC contain per-cpu state for estimating the RTC value
> + * - pointer to the RBC structure for all cpus on the blade
> + * - last_rtc_value returned on this cpu. This is used to
> + * make sure time never goes backward.
> + *
> + * Implementation Notes:
> + * - I tried making the RBC table a per-socket table instead of a
> + * per-blade table. That did not work & a pair of cpus could see
> + * time go backward. Cachelines bounce between sockets faster
> + * than the the accuracy of the RTC calculation.
> + * - the most critical inter-cpu timing is for passing RTC
> + * values between HT threads in the same core. Other inter-cpu
> + * times are much larger.
> + */
> +
> +/*
> + * The following structures are used to manage the per-node UV RTC
> + * structures used to calculate RTC values from the local RTC. Access
> + * to the local TSC is much faster than a RTC access.
> + *
> + */
> +
> +/* Maximum attempts to read a TSC/RTC pair before giving up */
> +#define MAXREADS 10
> +
> +/* Maximum TSC nsec to read a TSC/RTC pair. Try again if exceeded. */
> +#define DEFAULT_MAX_READCLOCKS_TSC_NSEC 10000
> +
> +/* Reread a TSC/RTC pair if it is older than the following. */
> +#define DEFAULT_RESYNC_CLOCKS_MSEC 2000
> +
> +/* Recalculate fixmult if it is older than the following. */
> +#define DEFAULT_RECALC_DRIFT_MSEC 20000
> +
> +static long resync_clocks_msec = DEFAULT_RESYNC_CLOCKS_MSEC;
> +static long recalc_drift_msec = DEFAULT_RECALC_DRIFT_MSEC;
> +static long max_readclocks_tsc_nsec = DEFAULT_MAX_READCLOCKS_TSC_NSEC;
> +
> +static atomic_t resync_clocks_failures;
Do you want all these to end up the same cacheline and bounce around nodes?
If not then judicious application of __read_mostly and
__cacheline_aligned ought to cure it.
> +
> +#define ZZMAXDELTA 1000 //ZZZ debug
> +atomic_t zzdelta[ZZMAXDELTA + 1]; //ZZZ debug
We dont want any of the ZZZ things upstream, right?
> /*
> + * Atomic cmpxchg of a 128-bit value (pair of DW)
> + */
> +static inline int uv_cmpxchg128(void *p, unsigned long oldhi, unsigned long oldlo,
> + unsigned long newhi, unsigned long newlo)
> +{
> + unsigned char ret;
> +
> + asm volatile( "lock; cmpxchg16b (%1)\n\t"
> + "sete %0\n\t"
> + : "=qm" (ret)
> + : "r"(p), "d"(oldhi), "a"(oldlo), "c"(newhi), "b"(newlo)
> + : "memory", "cc");
> + return ret;
> +}
That's a rather interesting piece of code that is not UV specific at
all, so it should move into the appropriate arch/x86/include/asm/ header
file.
> +
> +
-ETOOMANYNEWLINES
> +/*
> + * Atomic read of 128 bit value (pair of DW)
> + */
> +static inline void uv_read128(unsigned long *wd,
> + unsigned long *hi, unsigned long *lo)
Should move into a header file too.
> +{
> + unsigned long t0, t1, t0x;
> +
> + do {
> + barrier();
> + t0 = wd[0];
> + barrier();
> + t1 = wd[1];
> + barrier();
> + t0x = wd[0];
> + } while (t0 != t0x);
> + *hi = t1;
> + *lo = t0;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Convert a nsec/msec to a TSC delta for the specified cpu
> + */
> +static unsigned long long uv_nsec_2_cycles(unsigned long nsec, int cpu)
> +{
> + unsigned long long cyc;
> + cyc = (nsec << CYC2NS_SCALE_FACTOR) / (per_cpu(cyc2ns, cpu));
> + return cyc;
-ETOOFEWNEWLINES
Also, there doesnt seem to be anything UV specific about this, right?
> +}
> +
> +static unsigned long long uv_msec_2_cycles(unsigned long msec, int cpu)
> +{
> + return uv_nsec_2_cycles(msec * 1000000, cpu);
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Atomically read the RTC & TSC. For accuracy, if it
> + * takes too long to access the RTC, try again. It is imporatnt that
> + * the TSC/RTC values be read as close as possible at the same time.
> + * Under certain pathological workloads, it can take a long time to
> + * read the RTC. Be paranoid - after a few attempts at reading a
> + * RTC/TSC pair, return a failure. Caller can try again later.
> + */
> +static noinline int uv_readclocks(struct uv_rtc_cpu_control *rcc,
> + unsigned long *tsc, unsigned long *rtc)
> +{
> + unsigned long z, flags, delta, rtc0, tsc0, tsc1;
> + unsigned volatile long *myrtcp = rcc->myrtcp;
> +
> + int cnt = MAXREADS;
> +
> + do {
> + local_irq_save(flags);
> + mb();
> + rdtscll(tsc0);
> + mb();
> + rtc0 = *myrtcp;
> + mb();
Note, we have rdtsc_barrier() for such purposes. Beyond being faster
it's even self-documenting. (unlike standalone mb()s)
> + rdtscll(tsc1);
> + local_irq_restore(flags);
> + delta = tsc1 - tsc0;
> + cnt--;
> + z = delta / 100; //ZZZZZZZZZ debug
> + if (z > ZZMAXDELTA) //ZZZZZZZZZ debug
> + z = ZZMAXDELTA; //ZZZZZZZZZ debug
> + atomic_inc(&zzdelta[z]); //ZZZZZZZZZ debug
And we dont want ZZZZZZZZZ's (and C++ comments) upstream either, right?
> + if (cnt == 0)
> + return -1;
> + } while (delta > rcc->max_readclocks_tsc_delta);
> + *rtc = rtc0;
> + *tsc = tsc1;
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Read the current RTC value. RTC access is several hundred nsec &
> + * can be a performance issue. In most cases, the current RTC value
> + * is calculated based on the current TSC value (fast access) and the
> + * TSC delta since a TSC/RTC pair was last read..
> + */
> +static cycle_t uv_read_rtc_calc(struct clocksource *cs)
> +{
> + struct uv_rtc_cpu_control *rcc = __get_cpu_var(uv_rtc_cpu_control);
> + struct uv_rtc_blade_control *rbc = rcc->rbc;
> + unsigned long rtc, tsc, rtcx, tscx, rtc0m, tsc0m, rtc0, tsc0;
> + unsigned long fixmult;
> + unsigned long adj;
> +
> + uv_read128(&rbc->rtc0, &tsc0, &rtc0);
> + rdtscll(tsc);
> + fixmult = rbc->fixmult;
> +
> + if (unlikely((tsc0 + rcc->max_tsc_delta < tsc) || fixmult == 0))
> + goto resync;
> +
> + /*
> + * Cast to long to get sign extension on the shift - delta might
> + * be negative
> + */
> + adj = ((long)((tsc - tsc0) * fixmult)) >> 32;
> + rtc = rtc0 + adj;
> +
> +done:
> + /*
> + * Don't return a rtc value less than the previous. Note: optimized
> + * for typical case where last_rtc must be updated. Other case
> + * rarely happens.
> + */
> + rtc = max(rcc->last_rtc_value, rtc);
> + rcc->last_rtc_value = rtc;
> + return rtc;
> +
> +resync:
> + /*
> + * Periodically, reread a TSC/RTC pair. This prevents cumulative
> + * clock drift from causing incorect values to be calculated.
> + * If unable to read a TSC/RTC pair, disable RTC calculation
> + * and read it directly.
> + */
> +
> + if (unlikely(uv_readclocks(rcc, &tsc0, &rtc0) < 0))
> + goto syncfail;
> + uv_cmpxchg128(&rbc->rtc0, rbc->tsc0, rbc->rtc0, tsc0, rtc0);
> + uv_read128(&rbc->rtc0m, &tsc0m, &rtc0m);
> + if (unlikely(tsc0m + rcc->recalc_drift_tsc_delta < tsc0 ||
> + tsc0m == 0)) {
> + uv_cmpxchg128(&rbc->rtc0m, tsc0m, rtc0m, tsc0, rtc0);
> + if (tsc0m) {
> + rtcx = rtc0 - rtc0m;
> + tscx = tsc0 - tsc0m;
> + while (tscx > 0x7fffffff || rtcx > 0x7fffffff) {
> + tscx >>= 1;
> + rtcx >>= 1;
> + }
> + rbc->fixmult = (rtcx << 32) / tscx;
> + }
> + }
> + rtc = rtc0;
> + goto done;
> +
> +syncfail:
> + /*
> + * Unable to read a TSC/RTC pair. Disable dynamic calculation
> + * of the RTC value until a pair can be read.
> + */
> + rbc->tsc0m = 0;
> + rbc->fixmult = 0;
> + rtc = *rcc->myrtcp;
> + atomic_inc(&resync_clocks_failures);
> + goto done;
> +}
-EFUNCTIONTOOLONG
The goto maze is pretty disgusting as well - splitting the function will
help that problem too.
> +
> +static cycle_t uv_read_rtc(struct clocksource *cs)
> +{
> + struct uv_rtc_cpu_control *rcc = __get_cpu_var(uv_rtc_cpu_control);
> +
> + return *rcc->myrtcp;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> * Setup the RTC timer in oneshot mode
> */
> static void uv_rtc_timer_setup(enum clock_event_mode mode,
> @@ -354,6 +675,108 @@ static int __init uv_enable_evt_rtc(char
> }
> __setup("uvrtcevt", uv_enable_evt_rtc);
>
> +
> +#define UVCLK_ATTR(_name) \
> + static struct kobj_attribute uv_##_name##_attr = \
> + __ATTR(_name, 0644, uv_##_name##_show, uv_##_name##_store)
> +
> +#define UVCLK_ATTR_RO(_name) \
> + static struct kobj_attribute uv_##_name##_attr = \
> + __ATTR(_name, 0444, uv_##_name##_show, NULL)
> +
> +static void uv_update_all_blade_control(void)
> +{
> + struct uv_rtc_cpu_control *rcc;
> + int cpu;
> +
> + for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
> + rcc = per_cpu(uv_rtc_cpu_control, cpu);
> + rcc->recalc_drift_tsc_delta = uv_msec_2_cycles(recalc_drift_msec, cpu);
> + rcc->max_tsc_delta = uv_msec_2_cycles(resync_clocks_msec, cpu);
> + rcc->max_readclocks_tsc_delta = uv_nsec_2_cycles(max_readclocks_tsc_nsec, cpu);
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static ssize_t uv_recalculate_drift_msec_show(struct kobject *kobj,
> + struct kobj_attribute *attr, char *buf)
> +{
> + return sprintf(buf, "%lu\n", recalc_drift_msec);
> +}
> +static ssize_t uv_recalculate_drift_msec_store(struct kobject *kobj,
> + struct kobj_attribute *attr, const char *buf, size_t count)
> +{
> + unsigned long input;
> +
> + if (strict_strtoul(buf, 10, &input))
> + return 0;
> +
> + recalc_drift_msec = input;
> + uv_update_all_blade_control();
> +
> + return count;
> +}
> +UVCLK_ATTR(recalculate_drift_msec);
> +
> +static ssize_t uv_resync_clocks_msec_show(struct kobject *kobj,
> + struct kobj_attribute *attr, char *buf)
> +{
> + return sprintf(buf, "%lu\n", resync_clocks_msec);
> +}
> +static ssize_t uv_resync_clocks_msec_store(struct kobject *kobj,
> + struct kobj_attribute *attr, const char *buf, size_t count)
> +{
> + unsigned long input;
> +
> + if (strict_strtoul(buf, 10, &input))
> + return 0;
> +
> + resync_clocks_msec = input;
> + uv_update_all_blade_control();
> +
> + return count;
> +}
> +UVCLK_ATTR(resync_clocks_msec);
> +
> +static ssize_t uv_max_readclocks_tsc_nsec_show(struct kobject *kobj,
> + struct kobj_attribute *attr, char *buf)
> +{
> + return sprintf(buf, "%lu\n", max_readclocks_tsc_nsec);
> +}
> +static ssize_t uv_max_readclocks_tsc_nsec_store(struct kobject *kobj,
> + struct kobj_attribute *attr, const char *buf, size_t count)
> +{
> + unsigned long input;
> +
> + if (strict_strtoul(buf, 10, &input))
> + return 0;
> +
> + max_readclocks_tsc_nsec = input;
> + uv_update_all_blade_control();
> +
> + return count;
> +}
> +UVCLK_ATTR(max_readclocks_tsc_nsec);
> +
> +static ssize_t uv_resync_clocks_failures_show(struct kobject *kobj,
> + struct kobj_attribute *attr, char *buf)
> +{
> + return sprintf(buf, "%u\n", atomic_read(&resync_clocks_failures));
> +}
> +UVCLK_ATTR_RO(resync_clocks_failures);
> +
> +static struct attribute *uv_rtc_attrs[] = {
> + &uv_recalculate_drift_msec_attr.attr,
> + &uv_resync_clocks_msec_attr.attr,
> + &uv_max_readclocks_tsc_nsec_attr.attr,
> + &uv_resync_clocks_failures_attr.attr,
> + NULL,
> +};
> +
> +static struct attribute_group uv_rtc_attr_group = {
> + .attrs = uv_rtc_attrs,
> + .name = "sgi_rtc",
> +};
> +
> static __init void uv_rtc_register_clockevents(struct work_struct *dummy)
> {
> struct clock_event_device *ced = &__get_cpu_var(cpu_ced);
> @@ -365,29 +788,57 @@ static __init void uv_rtc_register_clock
>
> static __init int uv_rtc_setup_clock(void)
> {
> - int rc;
> + struct uv_rtc_cpu_control *rcc = __get_cpu_var(uv_rtc_cpu_control);
> + struct uv_rtc_blade_control *rbc, **rbcp;
> + struct clocksource *cs;
> + int b, rc, node, cpu, csi, numblades;
>
> if (!is_uv_system())
> return -ENODEV;
>
> - clocksource_uv.mult = clocksource_hz2mult(sn_rtc_cycles_per_second,
> - clocksource_uv.shift);
> + /* Allocate per node structures for RTC */
> + numblades = uv_num_possible_blades();
> + rbcp = kzalloc(sizeof(void *) * numblades, GFP_ATOMIC);
> + for_each_online_node(node) {
> + b = uv_node_to_blade_id(node);
> + if (!rbcp[b])
> + rbcp[b] = kzalloc_node(sizeof(*rbc), GFP_ATOMIC, node);
> + rbc = rbcp[b];
> + for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
> + if (cpu_to_node(cpu) == node) {
> + rcc = kzalloc_node(sizeof(*rcc), GFP_ATOMIC,
> + node);
Ignore checkpatch in cases where the solution to a warning is an uglie
like this one.
> + rcc->rbc = rbc;
> + rcc->myrtcp = uv_raw_rtc_address(cpu);
> + per_cpu(uv_rtc_cpu_control, cpu) = rcc;
> + }
> + }
> + uv_update_all_blade_control();
> + kfree(rbcp);
>
> - /* If single blade, prefer tsc */
> - if (uv_num_possible_blades() == 1)
> - clocksource_uv.rating = 250;
> + for (csi = 0; csi < ARRAY_SIZE(clocksources); csi++) {
> + cs = clocksources[csi];
> + cs->mult = clocksource_hz2mult(sn_rtc_cycles_per_second,
> + cs->shift);
> +
> + /* If single blade, prefer tsc */
> + if (uv_num_possible_blades() == 1)
> + cs->rating = 250;
> + rc = clocksource_register(cs);
> + if (rc)
> + goto error;
> + }
>
> - rc = clocksource_register(&clocksource_uv);
> - if (rc)
> - printk(KERN_INFO "UV RTC clocksource failed rc %d\n", rc);
> - else
> - printk(KERN_INFO "UV RTC clocksource registered freq %lu MHz\n",
> - sn_rtc_cycles_per_second/(unsigned long)1E6);
> + printk(KERN_INFO "UV RTC clocksource registered freq %lu MHz\n",
> + sn_rtc_cycles_per_second/(unsigned long)1E6);
>
> - if (rc || !uv_rtc_evt_enable || x86_platform_ipi_callback)
> - return rc;
> + if (sysfs_create_group(kernel_kobj, &uv_rtc_attr_group))
> + printk(KERN_INFO "UV RTC - unable to create /sys files\n");
>
> /* Setup and register clockevents */
> + if (!uv_rtc_evt_enable)
> + return 0;
> +
> rc = uv_rtc_allocate_timers();
> if (rc)
> goto error;
> @@ -415,8 +866,9 @@ static __init int uv_rtc_setup_clock(voi
> return 0;
>
> error:
> - clocksource_unregister(&clocksource_uv);
> printk(KERN_INFO "UV RTC clockevents failed rc %d\n", rc);
> + for (csi = csi - 1; csi >= 0; csi--)
> + clocksource_unregister(clocksources[csi]);
>
> return rc;
> }
Probably: -EFUNCTIONTOOBIG.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists