[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201009111754.59381.arnd@arndb.de>
Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2010 17:54:59 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Jens Axboe <jaxboe@...ionio.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] loop: fix double BKL lock
Patch 6e9624b8c "block: push down BKL into .open and .release"
accidentally introduced an extra lock_kernel() instead of
unlock_kernel(). Because of the recursiveness and
release-while-sleeping properties of the BKL, this did
not do much harm, but is incorrect nonetheless.
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
---
Please apply before 2.6.36
drivers/block/loop.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/block/loop.c b/drivers/block/loop.c
index 91797bb..d311e38 100644
--- a/drivers/block/loop.c
+++ b/drivers/block/loop.c
@@ -1448,7 +1448,7 @@ static int lo_release(struct gendisk *disk, fmode_t mode)
out:
mutex_unlock(&lo->lo_ctl_mutex);
out_unlocked:
- lock_kernel();
+ unlock_kernel();
return 0;
}
--
1.7.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists