| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20100911191146.7d38eba9@schatten.dmk.lab> Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2010 19:11:46 +0200 From: Florian Mickler <florian@...kler.org> To: Jan III Sobieski <jan3sobi3ski@...il.com> Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: 2458 days of Linux development - some stats and thoughts On Sat, 11 Sep 2010 00:04:18 +0200 Jan III Sobieski <jan3sobi3ski@...il.com> wrote: > I added regressions stats - total number of regressions for each > kernel and number of regressions not fixed yet. It is interesting that > the number of not fixed regressions is really low. > What should I do with these numbers, when I don't know how they are created? What do they signify? What is their relevance? What uncertainty is connected to these numbers? What follows? Why are they created? How are they related? Cheers, Flo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists