linux-kernel - Re: 2458 days of Linux development

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 11 Sep 2010 19:11:46 +0200
From:	Florian Mickler <florian@...kler.org>
To:	Jan III Sobieski <jan3sobi3ski@...il.com>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 2458 days of Linux development - some stats and thoughts

On Sat, 11 Sep 2010 00:04:18 +0200
Jan III Sobieski <jan3sobi3ski@...il.com> wrote:

> I added regressions stats - total number of regressions for each
> kernel and number of regressions not fixed yet. It is interesting that
> the number of not fixed regressions is really low.
> 

What should I do with these numbers, when I don't know
how they are created? What do they signify? What is their relevance?
What uncertainty is connected to these numbers? What follows? Why are
they created? How are they related? 

Cheers,
Flo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/