[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100911082054.GF705@dastard>
Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2010 18:20:54 +1000
From: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...e.de>
Cc: linux-scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-ide <linux-ide@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, dm-devel@...hat.com,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Combined storage tree
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 01:27:27PM -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> One of the requests from LSF10 in August was the production of a
> combined storage tree. This is now ready at
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jejb/storage-tree
>
> It's actually a nightly built merge tree consisting of
>
> scsi-misc; scsi-rc-fixes
> libata#upstream-fixes, libata#upstream
> block#for-linus, block#for-next
> and the dm quilt (which is empty at the moment).
>
> I haven't yet added vfs or any of the fs trees, but if necessary, I can.
>
> Note, because it's built nightly, like linux-next, it's hard (but not
> impossible) to use it as a basis for git trees (it is much easier to use
> it as a basis for quilts).
Hmmm. I was kind of hoping for an upstream maintainer tree, kind of
like the netdev tree. I really don't see a tree like this getting
wide use - if I enjoyed the pain of rebasing against throw-away
merge trees every day, then I'd already be using linux-next....
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@...morbit.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists