[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100911112855.6ee6e929@schatten.dmk.lab>
Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2010 11:28:55 +0200
From: Florian Mickler <florian@...kler.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Stephen Hemminger (role:commit_signer)" <shemminger@...tta.com>,
"Wolfram Sang (role:commit_signer)" <w.sang@...gutronix.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] get_maintainer.pl: append reason for cc to the name by
default
On Fri, 10 Sep 2010 20:45:51 -0400
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 05:31:14PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > If you don't like it, you could use a .get_maintainer.conf
> > file entry until some consensus is reached later.
>
> I don't use the pice of junk at all. What really pisses me off is that
> I get spamed by all by tons of utterly useless cleanups patches (and
> some useful but not at all interesting to me patches) because some
> idiot made the bloody script return my address just because I touched a
> file. If it goes on like that I'll simply have to add a mail filter to
> throw away all patches sent directly to me instead of a mailinglist.
>
But would you also have the same attitude towards these specific
'spams' if it were made clear in the email adress field that you were
cc'd as a commit_signer (vs maintainer)?
I know it is a bit hackisch to have stuff in the name field, but it is
rfc conform, it is even proposed for redirected email '(by way of...)'.
Cheers,
Flo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists